<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591</id><updated>2011-10-11T04:55:58.038-07:00</updated><category term='HR 1495'/><title type='text'>Legislative Vigilance</title><subtitle type='html'>This blog is a companion information source to the &lt;a href="http://www.2ndtuesdayconstitutiongroup.com/"&gt;2nd Tuesday Constitution Group&lt;/a&gt; for the purpose of gathering, tracking, and sharing vital information about important legislation.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>20</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-6312632852919647093</id><published>2011-02-08T13:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-02-09T10:51:05.176-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for February 8, 2011 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:180%;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Virginia Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1721&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Bob Marshall's bill to keep land use planning at the local level, and make now state mandated “Urban Development Areas” optional rather than mandatory (pushing back again Agenda 21), was reported out of the House Counties, Cities and Towns Committee by only one vote.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;YEAS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Marshall, R.G., Oder, Marshall, D.W., Iaquinto, Crockett-Stark, Poindexter, Merricks, Knight, Morefield, Stolle, LeMunyon, Wilt--12.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NAYS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Ingram, Edmunds, Spruill, Ware, O., Pollard, McQuinn, Howell, A.T., Surovell, Kory, Torian--10.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;ABSTENTIONS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--0.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NOT VOTING&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--0.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;There is a scheduled House vote today (Feb. 8) on this bill, but as of this update, no further information has been available.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1421 - Immigration Law Enforcement&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Reported from Courts of Justice with amendment (15-Y 6-N)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;YEAS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Albo, Kilgore, Athey, Janis, Bell, Robert B., Cline, Iaquinto, Gilbert, Peace, Miller, J.H., Loupassi, Villanueva, Habeeb, Johnson, Barlow--15.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NAYS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Armstrong, Watts, Toscano, Herring, McClellan, Hope--6.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;ABSTENTIONS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--0.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NOT VOTING&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Cleaveland--1.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1727 - Virginia Fair Employment Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (16-Y 4-N)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;YEAS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Albo, Kilgore, Athey, Janis, Bell, Robert B., Cline, Iaquinto, Gilbert, Peace, Miller, J.H., Loupassi, Villanueva, Habeeb, Johnson, Armstrong, Barlow--16.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NAYS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Watts, Herring, McClellan, Hope--4.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;ABSTENTIONS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--0.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NOT VOTING&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;--Cleaveland, Toscano--2.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1775 - School Transparency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (16-Y 4-N)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;YEAS--Albo, Kilgore, Athey, Janis, Bell, Robert B., Cline, Iaquinto, Gilbert, Peace, Miller, J.H., Loupassi, Villanueva, Habeeb, Johnson, Barlow, Watts--16.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NAYS--Armstrong, Herring, McClellan, Hope--4.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;ABSTENTIONS--0.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;NOT VOTING--Cleaveland, Toscano--2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1397 - End Mandatory Federal “Green” Home Inspections&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Delegate Bob Marshall: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;"HB 1397 passed the House of Delegates thanks to your help! This bill sets up another challenge to the federal government’s overreach which could require inspections by the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct mandatory “green” energy audits and mandatory remodeling before selling your home. It is now in the Senate Agriculture Committee."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 496 - End the Practice of Adding Taxes &amp;amp; Fees and Removing Tax Deductions in Budget&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Delegate Bob Marshall:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;I pre-filed this Constitutional Amendment on July 19, 2010 to end the practice of hiding fees and taxes in the budget. I spoke all around Virginia and my son designed a four-page glossy brochure to educate citizens. We printed, mailed and distributed nearly 10,000 brochures about the need for this Constitutional Amendment. Despite the tradition that when two virtually identical bills are introduced, the lower number bill passes, my bill was instead incorporated into Delegate Janis’ Bill, HJ 615 which was filed one day before session started. My bill was before the subcommittee the first week of session, but was passed over until Del. Janis was able to have his measure before the subcommittee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While this was an abuse of process (Delegate Janis is the Subcommittee Chair) imitation is a form of flattery. I thank you all for helping move the substance of my bill forward, even if the bill number does not bear by name, as it will promote the common good for Virginia.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Gun Bills discussed by &lt;a href="http://vcdl.org/"&gt;VCDL&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Senator Reynold's pneumatic gun bill, &lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;SB 757&lt;/span&gt;, passed the Senate and heads to the House, where it starts working its way through the committee structure all over again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The following anti-gun bills were KILLED, er, actually, CRUSHED, tonight in the House Militia, Police and Public Safety subcommittee #1:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1699&lt;/span&gt; - Delegate McClellan's "gun show loophole" bill died by a vote of 4 to 1 (Delegate Keam voted for the bill).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 2343&lt;/span&gt; - Delegate Morrissey's bill to criminalize the consumption of an alcoholic beverage in a restaurant by someone who is openly carrying a handgun died **unanimously.** A Richmond police officer in UNIFORM came to speak for all the gun control bills, including this one. That was awfully rich from someone who is allowed by the law to carry a concealed handgun and drink. What a hypocrite.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 2524&lt;/span&gt; - Delegate Carr's bill to ban the sale, barter or transfer of magazines that hold 20 or more rounds died **unanimously.**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Some Bad News&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1732&lt;/span&gt; - Delegate Carrico's full recognition of out-of-state permits was withdrawn without comment&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 2069&lt;/span&gt; - Delegate Athey's Constitutional Carry bill (no CHP required) was withdrawn. Athey stated that he had drawn up the bill himself and didn't use Legislative Services. The bill is fatally flawed, he said, and could not be fixed unless it is reintroduced with a different description and all the technical mistakes fixed. That, he vowed to do next year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Feb. 3 Update from the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold" href="http://www.tertiumquids.org/tmgc.html"&gt;Tuesday Morning Coalition Group&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;blockquote style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;1) Eminent Domain Constitutional Amendment:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 647&lt;/span&gt; Constitutional amendment; taking or damaging of private property for public use (first reference).&lt;br /&gt;Robert B. Bell  all patrons&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Status:&lt;br /&gt;01/12/11 House: Referred to Committee on Privileges and Elections&lt;br /&gt;01/13/11 House: Assigned P &amp;amp; E sub: #1 Constitutional&lt;br /&gt;01/17/11 House: Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (3-Y 2-N)&lt;br /&gt;01/28/11 House: Passed by for the day in Privileges and Elections by voice vote&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On late Thursday evening of last week, HJ 693 patroned by Del. Johnny Joannou contained the language to which we had agreed for reforming the eminent domain law of Virginia by constitutional amendment. By Friday morning the language had changed, substantially. No longer would property owners receive just compensation for their losses, as business losses would no longer be a compensable damage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After this language was struck from the resolution, the remaining language was made identical to a resolution put forth by Del. Rob Bell, HJ 647, and the decision was made that the new resolution would go forward with Del. Bell as the patron. Last Friday (1/28), the resolution was not brought up for a vote, but was carried over until this Friday (2/4).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The excuse given by legislators for not wanting to provide compensation for business loses to property owners who are having their land taken by eminent domain, is that this would cost too much. They acknowledge that there are real costs that must be borne by one of the parties. However, instead of society bearing these costs because it is benefitting from the taking of the property, the government wants this cost to be absorbed by the property owner who is already having to relinquish his property due to no fault of his own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If society is not willing to provide just, and full, compensation for the taking of private property, then we must ask ourselves if there was a real justification for taking the property in the first place.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please call the people on the committee below and tell them you want the language that was deleted from Del. Joannou’s resolution to be put in Del. Bell’s resolution before it is voted on this Friday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the final analysis this is another example of the state government putting its interests ahead of the interests of the people, or the state government putting the welfare of special interest condemners ahead of the people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This November all 140 members of the General Assembly are up for reelection.&lt;br /&gt;John Taylor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;House Privileges and Elections Committee Members:&lt;br /&gt;Del. Mark Cole (R) (804) 698-1088 DelMCole@house.virginia.gov (chairman)&lt;br /&gt;Del. Lacey Putney (I) (804) 698-1019 DelLPutney@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Riley Ingram (R) (804) 698-1062 DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Chris Jones (R) (804) 698-1076 DelCJones@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. David Albo (R) (804) 698-1042 DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. John Cosgrove (R) (804) 698-1078 DelJCosgrove@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. John O'Bannon (R) (804) 698-1073 DelJOBannon@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Robert Bell (R) (804) 698-1058 DelRBell@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Jackson Miller (R) (804) 698-1050 DelJMiller@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Steven Landes (R) (804) 698-1025 DelSLandes@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Bill Janis (R) (804) 698-1056 DelBJanis@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Timothy Hugo (R) (804) 698-1040 DelTHugo@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Todd Gilbert (R) (804) 698-1015 DelTGilbert@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. John Cox (R) (804) 698-1055 DelJCox@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Clarence Phillips (D) (804) 698-1002 DelBPhillips@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. James Scott (D) (804) 698-1053 DelJScott@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Kenneth Alexander (D) (804) 698-1089 DelKAlexander@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Johnny Joannou (D) (804) 698-1079 (no email)&lt;br /&gt;Del. Mark Sickles (D) (804) 698-1043 DelMSickles@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Algie Howell (D) (804) 698-1090 DelAHowell@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Rosalyn Dance (D) (804) 698-1063 DelRDance@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;Del. Lionel Spruill (D) DelLSpruill@house.virginia.gov&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;2) Intrastate Commerce:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB1438&lt;/span&gt; Goods produced or manufactured within State; not subject to federal law, federal regulation, etc.Mark L. Cole  all patrons&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Status: 01/27/11 Senate: Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. HB1438 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor. It is not expected to be taken up by the committee until after Crossover (2/9).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;3) Budget Transparency:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;SB 867&lt;/span&gt; Budget bill; Conference Committee Report shall not be considered until on website for 72 hours.&lt;br /&gt;Ralph K. Smith  all patrons&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Status: 01/26/11 Senate: Assigned Rules sub: #1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SB867 passed the Senate Rules Sub-Committee #1 by a vote of 2-1 (Quayle and Puckett voted yea, Edwards voted nay). It will now be heard in the full Senate Rules Committee. This committee meets at the call of the Chairman which could be as early as tomorrow afternoon or Friday morning. Please call the members of this committee TODAY to let them know we’re watching this bill, and ask them to vote YES on SB867.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1440 Prolife Bill&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Would&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;ul style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;li&gt;Express the consensus of the General Assembly that life begins at conception and that unborn children are endowed with fundamental rights.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Allow a parent to assert a civil cause of action for the wrongful death of a pre-born child. This was the effect of the equivalent Missouri law. While most states already recognize this cause of action, Virginia does not.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Create a foundation upon which future abortion regulations or prohibitions might be based. With this in place, the General Assembly might choose to enact future regulations that go beyond those currently allowed under Supreme Court precedent. This is because the law would recognize a separate source of fundamental rights for pre-born children to be affirmed and recognized as valid under the Virginia and the U.S. Constitution.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Bill Commentary the Roanoke Tea Party:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;blockquote style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;SJ 27&lt;/span&gt; CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT; TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC USE (FIRST REFERENCE).&lt;br /&gt;Based on the sad history of eminent domain in Roanoke, not voting for this is unconscionable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 558&lt;/span&gt; U.S. CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS; SUBCOMMITTEE TO STUDY COMPLIANCE OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ETC.&lt;br /&gt;We strongly contend that nullification is the right and proper path for the Commonwealth to take to combat Federal overreach. We are confident this committee will show that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 557&lt;/span&gt; ALTERNATIVE CURRENCY; SUBCOMMITTEE TO STUDY WHETHER SHOULD ADOPT IF BREAKDOWN OF FEDERAL RESERVE.&lt;br /&gt;Preparing for the inevitable collapse of the Federal Reserve System is prudent. We welcome this study, as it will cast light on the disaster that is our Federal Reserve System.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:180%;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Federal Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;H.R. 67 - Renewal of expiring provisions the Patriot Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Congress is expected to vote on today (Feb. 8) on this bill, but as of the time of this update the vote has not yet occurre&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;d.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:#333333;"&gt;Feb. 9 Update:  The renewal bill is H.R. 514.  The bill failed a Feb. 8 House vote.  See this &lt;a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2011/02/08/rachel-maddow-in-shock-tea-partiers-defeat-patriot-act/"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; for more info.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:#333333;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) up for re-authorization&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;VAWA was authored by Joe Biden. It costs $1 billion per year, and violates the 14th Amendment Equal Protection clause, providing domestic-violence protections and benefits exclusively to women, and effective made men guilty until proven innocent concerning domestic disputes.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;ObamaCare 1099 Reporting Requirements&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Good news on the IRS 1099 form reporting requirements for commercial transactions of $600 or more (which, among many types of transactions, would have affected transactions for precious metals). Those requirements are expected to be repealed in this Congressional session. Harry Reid, of all people, has been on the record advocating the repeal of the 1099 provisions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;See&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;li&gt;http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/Baucus-Reid-Pledge-Repeal-1099-Requirements-57029-1.html&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;http://www.kansascity.com/2011/02/03/2629519/health-laws-bookkeeping-provision.html&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-6312632852919647093?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/6312632852919647093/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2011/02/legislative-update-for-february-8-2011.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/6312632852919647093'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/6312632852919647093'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2011/02/legislative-update-for-february-8-2011.html' title='Legislative Update for February 8, 2011 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-1799548254974364067</id><published>2011-01-11T12:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-11T14:44:05.934-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for January 11, 2011 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" &gt;Congressional Lame Duck Session:&lt;/span&gt;  The attricious Food Safety Bill, (formerly known as S510).  Details &lt;a href="http://www.anh-usa.org/both-house-and-senate-vote-yes-on-food-safety-bill/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:180%;"&gt;Virginia Legislative Session&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" &gt;(Commencing Jan. 12)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+sum+HB1515"&gt;HB 1515&lt;/a&gt; - Allows police to use red light activation terminals as a basis for detaining or arresting drivers who run read lights.  Red light activation terminals allow police to remotely check whether a light is red, so that they do not have to follow red light offenders through an intersection to catch up with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1357"&gt;HB 1357&lt;/a&gt; Virginia's Atmospheric Sovereignty Act, introduced by Adam Light, who describes it thusly:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;"HB-1357 in essence nullifies any federal law or regulation that attempts to limit the amount of CO2 that is emitted into the atmosphere. It is my contention that the effects of CO2 on Earth’s overall climate is greatly overstated by some in the scientific and political communities; it is also my contention that even if anthropogenic global warming could be proven, It is far more effective to allow each community and state decide how to best deal with it considering the varying social and economic situations of each, as opposed to a blanket of one size fits all regulation. Given that regardless of what any individual state, or even the United States does, the rest of the world will decide for itself; I think this to be the proper course. "&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1521"&gt;HB 1521&lt;/a&gt; - Allows corporatization of water authorities, sewer authorities, sewage disposal  authorities, stormwater control authorities, and refuse collection and disposal  authorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1522"&gt;HB 1522&lt;/a&gt; - Grants eminent domain powers (confiscation of private property powers) to the entities corporatized by HB 1521.  Also, in Prince William County, allows for occupation and excavation of lands adjoining confiscated land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1510"&gt;HB 1510&lt;/a&gt; - Sponsored by Delegate Jim Scott. This bill is very similar to another bill, HB 1528, that was registered, but later recanted, by Delegate "Dickie" Bell, after public uproar.  Both bills required pawnbrokers and precious metals dealers to report daily to police on the details of transactions involving precious metals and gems as well as physical description of the transactors with said businesses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Commentary from &lt;a href="http://www.cvconnect.solanqui.com/"&gt;The Conservative Virginian&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;But, as Paul Harvey used to say, "Now for the rest of the story."  The existing code Dickie's withdrawn bill intended to amend is 54.1-1401.  It originated from HB 1133 [Delegate Ralph L. Axselle (1974-1990), D, District 72], 1981 Virginia General Assembly Session.  It has been amended at least twice since, once in 2001 (HB 1591) [Delegate Vincent F. Callahan, R, District 34] and 2007 (SB 654) [Senator Kenneth W. Stolle, R, District 8]. I think there was a third time, but I have not yet found that one.  But the problem is the language of the existing code.  Amongst the insidious requirements for a dealer in precious metals and gems at the time someone sells to the dealer is to record "the full name, residence address, work place, home and work telephone numbers, date of birth, sex, race, height, weight, hair and eye colors, and other identifying marks of the seller". TALK ABOUT INVASION OF PRIVACY!  This sounds like a totalitarian government. The nature of this is something we associate with Nazi Germany.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And here is the final ugly aspect.  If you think what Dickie had submitted was bad then consider what Delegate Jim Scott has filed, HB 1510.  His bill would require the dealer to take a picture of the seller, along with a picture of the object being sold.  &lt;a href="http://dela.state.va.us/dela/MemBios.nsf/a7b082ef6ed01eac85256c0d00515644/23faca12e986ed2b85257535005773e6?OpenDocument"&gt;Jim Scott&lt;/a&gt; is a Democrat from the 53rd District (Part of the County of Fairfax and the City of Falls Church).   His phone number in Richmond is (804) 698-1053.  His District Office phone number is 703-560-8338.  His email is DelJScott@house.virginia.gov.  So make a choice People - either sit on your thumbs or start dialing this joker, and call your Delegate to say NO.  Then&lt;br /&gt;we need to get to the business of replacing code 54.1-1401.  I have offered Delegate Bell the following loose language as an alternative approach to meeting the police request for tracking potential sales of material from thefts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead of requiring licensed dealers in precious metals, pawn shops, etc. to automatically report transactions lets reverse the direction:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is the responsibility of the victim of the theft to report the theft to the police.  The police are then responsible to send out a bulletin of the theft to every precious metal and pawn shop dealer - state-wide.  (These dealers would be on an alert network, email or what, when licensed.  The police's would alert deals by way of that network.)  The dealer would then report any transaction that would seem to be related to theft.  The recording of the individual (name, address, and phone) by way of acceptable ID coming into the dealer's business would be at the discretion of the dealer and not at the command of Government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this manner a responsible dealer would be helping police - a good thing. But the inroad of the Government to corrupt or stretch the responsibility, or use it for an unintended or over-reaching manner in the future, by way of a regulation requiring carte blanche reporting of customer activity would be avoided.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1574"&gt;HB 1574&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;"Mandatory self-identification. &lt;/b&gt; Provides that any person, when he is  lawfully detained by a law-enforcement officer under circumstances that  reasonably indicate that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to  commit a crime, and is requested by the officer to identify himself, shall do  so. Any such person who refuses to identify himself is guilty of a Class 1  misdemeanor."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note the verbiage: "reasonably indicate that the person ... is about to  commit a crime".  This starts down a very dangerous slippery slope.  This bill now opens the door the police behave like Gestapo and require anyone to "show their papers" based solely upon suspicion, or a fabrication of suspicion.  Anyone charged with not showing identification is put in the position of having to prove he was not &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;intending&lt;/span&gt; to do any thing illegal, which is often impossible to do, and which amounts sanction presumption of guilt without proof of said guilt.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=sj300"&gt;SJ 300&lt;/a&gt; - Introduced by Stephen H. Martin.  ('J' stands for Joint as in a joint House/Senate bill)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Constitutional amendment (first resolution); electoral boards and general registrars.  Permits the General Assembly to provide by law that two or more counties and cities may share one electoral board and general registrar if a majority of the voters in each participating county and city so approve and the localities already share clerks of court. This proposed amendment is patterned after the provision in the present Constitution for the sharing of constitutional officers by consenting localities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Commentary from &lt;a href="mailto:daverabt@gmail.com"&gt;Dave Mason&lt;/a&gt;, of The Constitution Party of Augusta County:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;"Thank you Danny Goad [of the 2nd Tuesday Constitution Group] for this one.  SJ 600 is the hard core porn of Agenda 21 (A-21) and somebody must stick a wooden stake in it.  This is further Regional Government, the favorite modus operandi of the A-21 forces of tyranny and it further dilutes and disenfranchises We the People."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The following bills and commentary are excerpted from email notices also sent out by &lt;a href="mailto:daverabt@gmail.com"&gt;Dave Mason&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;SJ 300 Constitutional amendment; two or more counties and cities may share one electoral board, etc.&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by: Stephen H. Martin | all patrons    ...    notes | add to my profiles&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=SJ300&amp;amp;Submit2=G&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?111+ful+SJ300&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary as Introduced:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Constitutional amendment (first resolution); electoral boards and general registrars.  Permits the General Assembly to provide by law that two or more counties and cities may share one electoral board and general registrar if a majority of the voters in each participating county and city so approve and the localities already share clerks of court. This proposed amendment is patterned after the provision in the present Constitution for the sharing of constitutional officers by consenting localities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you Danny Goad for this one. SJ 600 is the hard core porn of Agenda 21 (A-21) and somebody must stick a wooden stake in it. This is further Regional Government, the favorite modus operandi of the A-21 forces of tyranny and it further dilutes and disenfranchises We the People.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SJ 300 and the 'J' stands for Joint as in a joint House/Senate bill.&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB 1420 Immigration laws; State Police to enter into agreement with U.S. Immigration &amp;amp; Customs Enforcement.&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by: David B. Albo | all patrons    ...    notes | add to my profiles&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1420&amp;amp;Submit2=Go&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary as Introduced:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Enforcement of immigration laws; agreement with United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  Provides that the Superintendent of State Police shall seek to enter into a memorandum of agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement that would allow the State Police to perform certain federal immigration law-enforcement functions in the Commonwealth. Such an agreement is often referred to as an agreement under the federal 287(g) program.&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Immigration Bills:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB 1430 Arresting officer to ascertain citizenship of arrestee; supplements existing law.&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by: David B. Albo | all patrons    ...    notes | add to my profiles&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1430&amp;amp;Submit2=Go&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary as Introduced:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arresting officer to ascertain citizenship of arrestee. Supplements the existing law that requires sheriffs to make a query into legal presence when a person is "taken into custody" at a jail. This bill expands such inquiries by requiring inquiries of everyone arrested, independent of whether they were taken into custody at a jail and requires that an arresting officer inquire of every arrestee whether he (i) was born in a country other than the United States and (ii) is a citizen of a country other than the United States and that, if the person responds he was born in another country and is not a citizen of the United States, the officer shall make an immigration alien query to the Law Enforcement Support Center of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and shall communicate the results of any immigration alien query to the Central Criminal Records Exchange of the Department of State Police in a format approved by the Exchange.&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB 1421 Immigration laws, federal; enforcement by State, political subdivisions, or localities.&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by: David B. Albo | all patrons    ...    notes | add to my profiles&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1421&amp;amp;Submit2=Go&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary as Introduced:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Enforcement of federal immigration law by the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions.  Provides that no agency of the Commonwealth, political subdivision of the Commonwealth or locality, or an employee of any of them acting in his official capacity, may limit or restrict the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent permitted by federal law. The bill also provides, in a second enactment, that the Governor may withhold the appropriation of state funds under his control to any agency, political subdivision of the Commonwealth, or locality in violation of this act, or to any agency, political subdivision of the Commonwealth, or locality whose employee is in violation of this act, in an amount deemed sufficient to ensure compliance, and shall release the funds to the entity when compliance is achieved.&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB 1465 Higher educational institutions; admission of illegal aliens.&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by: Christopher K. Peace | all patrons    ...    notes | add to my profiles&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=hb1465&amp;amp;Submit2=Go&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary as Introduced:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Admission of illegal aliens at institutions of higher education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(below code insertion highlighted)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?111+ful+HB1465   (Change in Sec. 23-9.2:3 - highlighted below)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible for admission to any public institution of higher education in Virginia; (ii) (iii)the accreditation status of a Virginia public high school shall not be considered in making admissions determinations for students who have earned a diploma pursuant to the requirements established by the Board of Education; and (iii) (iv) the governing boards of the four-year institutions shall establish policies providing for the admission of certain graduates of Virginia community colleges as set forth in § 23-9.2:3.02.&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB 1468 Citizenship or legal presence required for public assistance; verification required.&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by: David B. Albo | all patrons    ...    notes | add to my profiles&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summary as Introduced:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Legal presence required for public assistance; verification required.  Provides that local departments of social services shall verify or cause to be verified information regarding the citizenship or legal presence of an applicant for public assistance prior to initiating provision of benefits, and that the Governor may withhold the appropriation of state funds under his control to any agency, political subdivision of the Commonwealth, or locality in violation of this act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These then are some of the immigration problem bills.  In general, we support them&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also--if you have your eyes on anything special--good or bad, pass it along and we will assist making sure that all groups (Tea Parties, Constitution Parties and other Constitution/Liberty friendly groups) see your offering(s).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks much!&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IV.  Amendments and VA Fair Employment Act:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Folks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The below is in from the person you tipped us off to HB 1528...and with that,  the wheels were set into motion  We owe a debt of deep gratitude here. Add some thunderous applause too!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This person would like some feedback on the below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dave&lt;br /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br /&gt;From an email questioner:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know you are all busy but if you have a chance I have questions about legislation we are supposed to support. Number 1 I think is critical because the Tea Party is sponsoring it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. The Repeal Amendment. (Tea Party)&lt;br /&gt;It sounded like a great idea until I read Del. Bob Marshall's thoughts.  As he points out this could undo good laws as well as bad laws like Obamacare.  This has the potential to destroy our whole Constitution.  I personally can't support this but does the TEA party really want to support this?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Dave comment: It's been time since we looked at this...but we tend to agree with Bob Marshal. We think that this approach is not well thought out as to consequences. The states already have the power to reject unconstitutional laws, executive orders, regulations and other edicts.  Google and see the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions.  They are the best writing on this matter.  http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2010/oct/17/ed-marshall17-ar-566354/)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Virginia Fair Employment Act (American Council for immigration reform)&lt;br /&gt;This requires E-verify.  A voluntary system involving Homeland Security and Social Security. It does not provide immigration status.  So again this seems like more snooping on legal citizens - more tracking.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Constitutional Amendment to Eliminate State Income Taxes.&lt;br /&gt;I'm all for doing away with income tax but I'm not big on Constitutional Amendments.  The amendment requires phasing our corporate and income tax in 4 years.  Is this plausible and worth pursuing?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From Delegate Bob Marshall:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Please help me pass the following bills which have a direct or indirect effect on jobs and family welfare. I have introduced or will introduce these measures in the 2011 General Assembly session which begins January 12:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;No Hidden Taxes/Fees  &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=Hj496"&gt;HJRes 496&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, a constitutional amendment, seeks to promote accountability and transparency by ending the practice of hiding fee and tax increases and removals of tax deductions in the Budget bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Home Ownership &amp;amp; Title Protection&lt;/span&gt;   &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1506"&gt;HB 1506&lt;/a&gt; seeks to protect home ownership and maintain the integrity of real property tiles by requiring proper recording in the Courthouse as investment banks buy and sell bundles of mortgages for investment securities and record transfers through a private entity, MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration System) to avoid (evade?) recordation fees and taxes. In some cases numerous banks had claimed title to the same property. This affects foreclosures and passing property on to heirs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Block Obama Cap &amp;amp; Trade&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1397"&gt;HB 1397&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1398"&gt;HB 1398&lt;/a&gt; will challenge the federal government’s “Cap &amp;amp; Trade” mandates regarding Kyoto-like CO2 emissions and proposed federal “green” home energy audit inspections before you can sell your home.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Freedom of Information&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1457"&gt;HB 1457&lt;/a&gt; and a companion bill require that if a FOI officer purposely withholds documents available under Freedom of Information, that employee is fired. It also mandates documents be classified as they are created, as either subject to or not subject to FOI to prevent huge “research” fees for FOI documents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Life Insurance Benefits&lt;/span&gt;   &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1458"&gt;HB 1458&lt;/a&gt; requires that if the family of a deceased beneficiary does not take an immediate payout from a life insurance policy, the assets of the insurance fund must be secured so that the family of the deceased does not lose money.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Financial Stability Study&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HJ557"&gt;HJRes 557&lt;/a&gt; studies the feasibility of a possible alternative currency in the event of a breakdown of the Federal Reserve leading to excessive inflation. Fed Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told a Congressional Committee recently that: "the federal government is on an unsustainable fiscal path."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Federal Abuses of Bill of Rights&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HJ558"&gt;HJRes 558&lt;/a&gt; studies and documents the compliance or non-compliance of the federal government with regard to the Constitution and our Bill of Rights.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Legal Person Status for Preborn Children&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&amp;amp;typ=bil&amp;amp;val=HB1440"&gt;HB 1440&lt;/a&gt; will begin restoring the first civil right in our Declaration of Independence, life, to preborn children in certain areas by enacting “The Missouri language,” which was already upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and cannot be challenged. This will allow wrongful death tort suits for the death of a child before birth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Keep Land Use Planning Local&lt;/span&gt;   My bill will amend current law which now requires localities to designate and rezone urban high growth areas. Localities will be permitted to examine, but will not be required to rezone these areas. This bill addresses concerns over “Agenda 21,” the United Nation’s international land use planning initiatives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mint Bullion Coins for Investors&lt;/span&gt;   I will introduce a bill to authorize Virginia to mint gold and silver bullion coins to raise revenue for Virginia. The U.S. Mint brought in $2.855 Billion in sales of American Eagle Silver, Gold or Buffalo Gold bullion coins. The Commonwealth could authorize bullion coins to be minted which could create jobs in the areas of manufacturing and sales while allowing Virginians a chance to hedge against the devaluation of the dollar.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell &amp;amp; VA National Guard&lt;/span&gt;   I will introduce a bill to continue the DADT policy in Virginia’s National Guard. The Lame Duck Congress with 13% approval rating recently ended 232 years of military policy and 6000 years of moral teaching, on a Saturday in late December by repealing DADT. See my Op Eds in the Washington Times by clicking here,the Daily Press here and the Fox News interview by clicking here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Lyme Disease&lt;/span&gt;   Rejects the very narrow CDC definition of Lyme Disease and requires that any Virginia physician who treats suspected or confirmed Lyme Disease shall report the number of persons so treated to the Commonwealth.&lt;br /&gt;The bills I introduce this session can be found and tracked here: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+mbr+H57C&lt;br /&gt;Please ask your own state delegate and state senator to support my bills and please ask your family and friends around the state to do the same. You can find out who represents you here: http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform.&lt;br /&gt;Also ask the Governor to support my bills by contacting him here: http://www.governor.virginia.gov/AboutTheGovernor/contactGovernor.cfm.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;Federal Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;RED ALERT:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the aftermath of the recent mass shooting in Tucson, AZ, whereby a federal judge, John McCarthy, and a 9 year old girl were among the victim dead, and whereby Representative Gabriell Giffords was critically wounded, Representative Carolyn McCarthy is preparing to introduce a gun control bill that is expected to outlaw high capacity ammunition magazines.  Senator Frank Lautenberg intends to introduce similar legislation in the Senate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further Details: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47338.html#continue&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.R. 2 - Repeal of ObamaCare&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by Rep. Eric Cantor.  Details &lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h2/show"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-1799548254974364067?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/1799548254974364067/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2011/01/legislative-update-for-january-11-2011.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/1799548254974364067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/1799548254974364067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2011/01/legislative-update-for-january-11-2011.html' title='Legislative Update for January 11, 2011 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-5277060266657539306</id><published>2010-12-14T11:54:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-12-14T14:32:08.223-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for December 14, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);"&gt;!!! HIGH ALERT !!!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;LAME DUCK SESSION&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; of Congress&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;S.3991 - Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This bill is a newer version of &lt;a href="http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/05/legislative-update-for-may-11-2010.html#may2010_s3194"&gt;S.3194&lt;/a&gt;, introduced by Harry Reid on Dec. 1, 2010.  The aim of the bill is the unconstitutional compulsory unionization of state and local public-safety workers.  It would eliminate local government control over the labor relations of their own workers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fortunately the bill failed a Dec. 8 &lt;a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00266"&gt;vote&lt;/a&gt; cloture which required 60 votes.  The cloture vote failed with 53 yay votes to 43 nay votes, and 2 senators abstaining.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;S.3772 - Paycheck Fairness Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Introduced by Harry Reid This bill narrowly failed a cloture vote on November 17 with 58 Ayes, 41 Nays, and 1 senator abstaining.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The following description from &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Eagle Forum&lt;/span&gt; summarizes why we should be glad cloture failed:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Originally introduced by Hillary Clinton during her time in the Senate, and reintroduced by Sen. Harry Reid, the Paycheck Fairness Act (S. 3772) (PFA) would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) in the following ways:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Allows for unlimited compensatory and punitive damages to be granted, even without proof of intent to discriminate.  Currently, an employer must be found to have intentionally engaged in discriminatory practices in order for an employee to receive monetary compensation, and even then, the employee is entitled only to back pay.  The provision in the PFA is unacceptable and unnecessary, as damages are already available under Title VII for pay discrimination.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Changes the “establishment” requirement.  The EPA currently requires that employees whose pay is being compared must work in the same physical place of business.  The PFA would amend the word “establishment” to mean workplaces in the same county or political district.  It would also invite the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to develop “rules or guidance” to define the term more broadly.  This leaves the door open for the EEOC to compare a woman’s job in a rural area to a man’s job in an urban area that has a much higher cost of living, which would drive up the cost of employing the woman in the rural lower cost area.  Such increase in employment costs would result in fewer people being employed, and would also result in employers shipping jobs overseas.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Replaces a successful pay discrimination-determining system with a proven failed system.  The PFA would invalidate the successful, Supreme Court-endorsed system for determining whether pay discrimination has occurred (known as the Interpretative Standards for Systemic Compensation Discrimination), and would replace it with the highly inaccurate Equal Opportunity Survey, which has found true discriminators to be non-discriminators 93 percent of the time.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Increases the numbers in class-action suits.  Under EPA, if an employee wants to participate in a class-action suit against his employer, he must affirmatively decide to participate in the suit.  The PFA would automatically include employees in class-action suits, unless they affirmatively opt out.  This change would result in booming business for trial attorneys, and huge costs to employers, who may decide to ship jobs overseas to avoid such costs altogether.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;In addition to these changes, the PFA would institute a system of  “comparable worth” effectively allowing judges, juries and unelected bureaucrats to set employees’ wages, instead of employers.  Thus, an employee’s compensation level would be based on some vague notion of his “worth,” instead of on concrete factors like education, experience, time in the labor force, and hours worked per week.  The PFA would also cause employers to avoid hiring women in low-paying positions, since the employers may then become targets for burdensome lawsuits.  This trend would result in even higher unemployment for low-skilled women, potentially increasing the number of families dependent on government assistance. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.R. 5987 - Seniors Protection Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From OpenCongress.org:  "&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID4"&gt;Directs  the Secretary of the Treasury to disburse a $250 payment to recipients  of Social Security, SSI (Supplemental Security Income under title XVI of  the Social Security Act), railroad retirement benefits, and veterans  disability compensation or pension benefits if no cost-of-living  adjustment is payable in 2011."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We already know that Social Security is broke since Bill Clinton robbed Social Security to claim he balanced the budget in the '90s.  Since then Social Security has been funded by later generations who are still currently working, and who will likely never receive compensation for the money they are coerced to pay into the system today.  The politicians are attempting to placate current Social Security recipients by offering this one-time disbursement, paid from money we will have to either borrow or print.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Dec. 8 there was a motion to suspend the rules and vote on this bill, which would have require a 2/3 majority vote to pass.  This &lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h5987/actions_votes"&gt;vote&lt;/a&gt; failed with 254 Ayes, 153 Nays, and 27 abstentions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.R.6416 - American Traveler Dignity Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OpenCongress.org Summary:  Removes legal immunity for government employees so that TSA screeners  would be subject to the same sexual harassment laws as the general  public. In the word's of Ron Paul, "if you can't grope another person,  if you can't x-ray people and endanger them with dangerous x-rays, if  you can't take nude photographs of people, why do we allow the  government to do it?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This bill was &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-N5adYM7Kw"&gt;introduced&lt;/a&gt; Nov. 17 by Representative Ron Paul in the midst of the latest controversy about the TSA and its molesting of travelers and it's deployment of &lt;a href="http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=3382%3Aairport-body-scanners-emit-t-rays-that-attack-human-dna&amp;amp;catid=1%3Alatest-news&amp;amp;Itemid=64&amp;amp;lang=en"&gt;DNA-unzipping&lt;/a&gt; body scanners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Despite all of the TSA controversy this bill only has two cosponsors at the time of this post.  They are Representatives Walter Jones and John Duncan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dream Act [H.R.6497 / S.3992]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The pro-amnesty bill for illegal aliens under 35 years of age was passed in the House on Dec. 8. with a 216 to 198 margin, with 208  Democrats and 8 Republicans voting for the bill, and 160 Republicans and  38 Democrats voting against it. &lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;The eight Republicans who went against the tide of common sense were:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1292167973_8"&gt;Joseph Cao&lt;/span&gt; (LA)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;Mike Castle (DE) &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;Lincoln Diaz-Balart (FL)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;Mario Diaz-Balart (FL) &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1292167973_9"&gt;Charles Djou&lt;/span&gt; (HI)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1292167973_10"&gt;Vernon Ehlers&lt;/span&gt; (MI)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1292167973_11"&gt;Bob Inglis&lt;/span&gt; (SC)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;Illeana Ros-Lehtinen (FL)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yiv503458779MsoNormal"&gt;For the complete roll call, visit: &lt;a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll625.xml" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1292167973_12"&gt;http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll625.xml&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the Senate on Dec. 9, Harry Reid attempted a cloture vote on the Dream Act and came up &lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3992/actions_votes"&gt;one vote shor&lt;/a&gt;t, and was forced to table the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;S.510 - FDA Food Safety Modernization Act&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the context of previous discussion of this bill, refer to this &lt;a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/029678_Senate_bill_Big_Agriculture.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is a long saga of deception surrounding this bill.  At its core it is actually a measure toward bringing the United States &lt;a href="http://rawearthliving.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/s510-is-part-of-codex-alimentarius/"&gt;in line&lt;/a&gt; with the globalist &lt;a href="http://farmwars.info/?p=3817"&gt;Codex Alimentarius&lt;/a&gt; agenda, which seeks to totally and globally, corporatize and control the worlds food supply, and deny small farmers and individuals the right to produce and sell their own food.  The even bigger picture is that Codex Alimentarius is one dimension of the &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;biw=1272&amp;amp;bih=690&amp;amp;q=eugenics+depopulation"&gt;eugenics depopulation agenda&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Nov. 30, S.510 passed the Senate with an amendment by a 73 to 25, yay or nay vote.  Nevermind that the Constitution requires all bills that raise revenue to originate in the House.  (This constitutional requirement was also ignored when TARP bill was originated in the Senate when the House voted initially voted it down.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many in the patriot community thought that the unconstitutionality of the S.510 originating in the Senate would be enough to stop the bill from proceeding.  Unfortunately, they were incorrect.  The language of S.510 was shamefully attached to H.R.3082 via H.R.1755, a continuing resolution bill for funding military operations and veterans benefits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Tax "Deal" between Democrats and Republicans&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to Campaign for Liberty:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You may have heard that Obama and the Republicans reached a deal to extend the current tax rates for two more years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But what the statists are trying to sweep under the rug is that part of this "deal" is that the Republicans will agree to a continuing resolution to fund the government until September 30, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That means the Republicans are selling out to fund ObamaCare for at least the next ten months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's vital you contact your senators immediately and DEMAND they blow up any shady deals to link extending the current tax rates to funding ObamaCare.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-5277060266657539306?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/5277060266657539306/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/12/legislative-update-for-december-14-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5277060266657539306'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5277060266657539306'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/12/legislative-update-for-december-14-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for December 14, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-5605528609319712920</id><published>2010-11-08T20:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-11-09T00:01:36.589-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for November 9, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);"&gt;!!! HIGH ALERT !!!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;LAME DUCK SESSION&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; of Congress&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Begins &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;November 15&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Look out!  A new lame duck session of Congress begins on November 15.  This session is the last chance for several terrible bills to be pushed through before many lame duck legislators are sent home for good.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who surprising escaped the lame duck branding amid questions of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://theintelhub.com/2010/11/03/harry-reid-steals-nevada-wins-amid-fraud/"&gt;election fraud&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;, is expected bring Cap and Trade (H.R. 2454) up for a vote.  The House of Representatives already passed the bill back on June 26, 2009.  It has been on the back burner ever since.  Cap and Trade has been such a controversial bill that Senate Democrats did not want to be on record voting for it going into the November election.  If the Harry Reid does not pass the bill in the lame duck session, the bill dies, and the Democrats would face little chance of passing it next year.  They would have to reintroduce it into the House of Representatives which will no longer be under their control.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Look out for Senator Dick Durbin to push forward the DREAM Act, which is a pro-amnesty bill for children of illegal aliens.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;There is a Defense Authorization Bill which has embedded in it a repeal of the current "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.  The repeal would allow gays to openly serve in the military.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Expect Joe Lieberman to push his Cybersecurity Bill (S. 3480) , which we covered in July's &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/07/legislative-update-for-july-13-2010.html"&gt;update&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;.  The bill essentially gives the President the power to seize control of, or shut down the internet.  Besides the huge economic and social disruptions, a shutdown of the internet would cut off sources of independent news from the people, and it would effectively take away much of the exercise of First Amendment rights we are so accustomed to today via the internet.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;There is also a push for the ratification a New Start nuclear armament reductions treaty with Russia.  This bill actually could be something positive out of this Congress.  Maintaining the current level of U.S. nuclear weapons is costing a lot of money when the U.S. is already broke.  Equitable reduction of nuclear armaments on both sides would be one of many needed steps toward fiscal sanity.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 are slated to expire unless renewed by the end of the year. Harry Reid has indicated that Democrats would likely vote against a wholesale extension of the tax cuts.  He said Democrats would agree to extending the cuts for middle-class families, Reid said, but allowing them for wealthy Americans “is not going to happen” because it would "cost" $4 trillion.  Lately, the definition of wealthy has been anyone married earning $250k, or single, $200k, annually.  This is the expected for the Democrats to apply for the renewal cut-off point.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Also look for the fake "food safety" bills &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/029678_Senate_bill_Big_Agriculture.html"&gt;S. 510&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;, and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/029828_Senate_bill_3767_dietary_supplements.html"&gt;S. 3767&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; to possible come to a vote.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;An &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/121223-dems-stuff-lame-duck"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; posted on The Hill mentions some additional legislative items that could be brought up in the lame duck session.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Virginia Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Although the next session of the Virginia legislature doesn't begin until January 12, 2011, there are some bills being lined up to be introduced for that session.  Delegate Bob Marshall pre-filed to introduce a bill that is to be a nullification measure to carbon emissions regulation provisions in the pending federal Cap and Trade bill.  Marshall's bill is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+ful+HB1397"&gt;HB 1397&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Delegate Bill Carrico is expected to reintroduce the Firearms Freedom bill which had failed to pass in the last legislative session.  The bill would prevent the federal government from regulating firearms and ammunition that is produced and sold within Virginia's borders.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The Virginia Campaign for Liberty is proposing a bill to repeal the invasive land use policy in HB 3202 that was passed in 2007  to comply with the United Nations Agenda 21 plan for "sustainable development".  More details about HB 3202 can be found &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=38981"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" &gt;Potential for New Fed Oversight&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;In the redux of the November midterm elections, Govtrack.us &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.govtrackinsider.com/articles/2010-11-05/ron-paul-set"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; that House Representative Ron Paul appears to be in line to be the next Chairman on the House subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade and Technology.  This subcommittee has the purview to investigate Federal Reserve on its monetary policy.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Last legislative session Ron Paul's H.R. 1207 bill to audit the Federal Reserve had garnered 320 cosponsors and passed the House, only to be effectively stripped out of the "Financial Reform" bill and replaced by audit measures that were severely limited for only a one-time application.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Representative Paul, with this expected position as the subcommittee chairman would have subpoena powers to finally pursue a long overdue investigation of the Fed's actions that have been hidden behind closed doors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-5605528609319712920?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/5605528609319712920/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/11/legislative-update-for-november-9-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5605528609319712920'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5605528609319712920'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/11/legislative-update-for-november-9-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for November 9, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-3970637376758850673</id><published>2010-10-12T13:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-10-13T07:50:03.476-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for October 12, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 4646 - Debt Free America Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;This bill is a terrible act.  It is worse than the European style "value added" tax (VAT) that taxes every stage of production of goods.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;This act imposes a 1% federal tax on &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;every&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; financial transaction.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;From OpenCongress.org:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;"&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;States  as purposes of this Act the raising of sufficient revenue from a fee on  transactions to eliminate the national debt within seven years and the  phasing out of the individual income tax. Amends the Internal Revenue  Code to impose a 1% fee, offset by a corresponding nonrefundable income  tax credit, on transactions that use a payment instrument, including any  check, cash, credit card, transfer of stock, bonds, or other financial  instrument. Defines "transaction" to include retail and wholesale sales,  purchases of intermediate goods, and financial and intangible  transactions. Establishes in the legislative branch the Bipartisan Task  Force for Responsible Fiscal Action to review the fiscal imbalance of  the federal government and make recommendations to improve such  imbalance. Provides for expedited consideration by Congress of Task  Force recommendations. Repeals after 2017 the individual income tax,  refundable and nonrefundable personal tax credits, and the alternative  minimum tax (AMT) on individuals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Directs the Secretary of the Treasury  to:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(1)&lt;/strong&gt; prioritize the repayment of the national debt to protect the fiscal stability of the United States; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2)&lt;/strong&gt; study and report to Congress on the implementation of this Act."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Even though the bill offers the repeals of the income tax &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;after&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; (just how long after?) 2017, the compounded taxes of every financial transaction would amount to multiple times the total wealth that is already confiscated under the income tax.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The bill is currently under consideration by four committees:  House Ways and Means, House Budget, House Rules, and House Appropriations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 6144 - Better Use of Light Bulbs Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act that were scheduled to phase-out of incandescent bulbs set to starting in 2011.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;See the following &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://somebodyhealme.dianalee.net/2010/10/eliminating-lightbulb-ban-there-is-new.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; for more information and to contact key House committee member.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;DREAM Act Illegal Alien Amnesty, continued&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;In late September Senate Democrats hoped to attach the pro-amnesty DREAM Act to the Defense bill that was under consideration.  Fortunately, the cloture vote on the Defense bill failed, with prevented the intended means for attaching the DREAM Act.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 6145 and S. 3791 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;(introduced by Tom Coburn)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;From the Sept. 22 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.blip.tv/file/4155733"&gt;Reality Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;"To require Members of Congress to disclose delinquent tax liability, require an ethics inquiry, and garnish the wages of a Member with Federal tax liability."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Section three details that within 30 days after filing, the member must "arrange with the Secretary of the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives, as appropriate, and the Internal Revenue Service to have their salary REDUCED by an amount appropriate to pay the taxes owed to the United States within a reasonable time period."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Support H.R. 6145 and S. 3791. They are small but pivotal steps to stop corruption in the government."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;S. 3790&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;(introduced by Tom Coburn)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;From the Sept. 22 &lt;a href="http://www.blip.tv/file/4155733"&gt;Reality Report&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;"A bill to amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that persons having seriously delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to Section 7381 part b, the ineligibility for federal employment applies to future and current employees, which means it can KEEP the bums out, and KICK some of them out too! These include the Secretary of Treasury, Timothy Geithner, Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, and 39 other Presidential Executive Office employees. All together they owe over $830,000."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Disclose Act, continued&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;On Sept. 23 the U.S. Senate failed to garner the 60 votes necessary to invoke cloture to consider the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/07/legislative-update-for-july-13-2010.html"&gt;DISCLOSE Act&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;. The final vote was 59-39.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Downsize DC: "This makes it very unlikely that the bill will be passed before the election, and there's almost no chance it could be passed after the Republican gain seats in Congress. This means DISCLOSE is dead. It's a definite victory."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;S. 3767 - Food Safety Accountability Act of 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;(introduced Sept. 13 by Patrick Leahy)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;From NaturalNews:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;Beware of Senate bill 3767, the so-called &lt;i&gt;Food Safety Accountability Act&lt;/i&gt;.  This dangerous legislation, if passed, would criminalize nutritional supplement  manufacturers &lt;b&gt;who tell the truth&lt;/b&gt; about their products or link to  published scientific studies describing the biological benefits of their  products. Based on language in the bill, health proponents who sell supplements  could be criminalized and convicted to &lt;b&gt;ten years in prison&lt;/b&gt;."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Continue &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/029828_Senate_bill_3767_dietary_supplements.html"&gt;reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;30 Large Corporations Get Obamacare Waivers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Via &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.dailypaul.com/node/146224"&gt;Daily Paul&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/2010-10-07-healthlaw07_ST_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip"&gt;USA Today&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Nearly a million workers won't get a consumer protection in the U.S. health reform law meant to cap insurance costs because the government exempted their employers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Thirty companies and organizations, including McDonald's (MCD) and Jack in the Box (JACK), won't be required to raise the minimum annual benefit included in low-cost health plans, which are often used to cover part-time or low-wage employees.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The Department of Health and Human Services, which provided a list of exemptions, said it granted waivers in late September so workers with such plans wouldn't lose coverage from employers who might choose instead to drop health insurance altogether.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="z-index: 1; display: inline;" id="bill_summary_extra" class="jqmWindow scrolling jqmID3"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-3970637376758850673?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/3970637376758850673/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/10/legislative-update-for-october-12-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/3970637376758850673'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/3970637376758850673'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/10/legislative-update-for-october-12-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for October 12, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-8123835766840757130</id><published>2010-09-14T09:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-09-14T13:37:18.769-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for September 14, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;Federal Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.R. 6099 and S. 3760 - Auto IRAs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This bill takes away more personal financial freedom.  It requires employees (who work for companies that have 10+ employees) to submit to a required automatic payroll deduction toward an "Auto IRA".  Of course, the bill is supported by financial companies, such as &lt;a href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20100907006136/en"&gt;Putnam Investments&lt;/a&gt;, who would benefit from a new class of involuntary customers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill is written in flowery language that attempts sound as if the politicians are just looking out for you, and Putnam's Chief Executive Officer, Robert L. Reynolds had the nerve to pretend that your potential loss of freedom is an event to be hailed.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;“This is a smart, low-cost idea that can give almost all working Americans a stake in our free enterprise system and help them secure their own futures at the same time. At the end of the day, all Americans would benefit from having a more inclusive, robust retirement savings system.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is believed by some insiders that the Auto-IRA is just a first step toward comprehensive nationalization of almost all retirement funds.  The thought is that this scheme will be used to finance government-issued debt instruments that foreign investors have been backing away from over the past year, forcing the Federal Reserve to monetize national debt by creating currency out of thin air to buy longer term national debt treasury bonds.  This process is analogous to a snake eating its own tail.  Those in power know it is unsustainable, and therefore this Auto IRA bill is likely only a first step toward further control of citizen retirement funds, which will effectively act as collateral for the debt byproduct of our suffocating behemoth government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It should be noted that defeating this plan is not as simple as just voting out Democrats and voting in Republicans in November.  Many on the conservative side are also spinning the Auto IRAs in a positive light, such as &lt;a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/08/13/the-automatic-ira-a-conservative-way-to-build-retirement-security/"&gt;David John&lt;/a&gt;, a leading analyst from the Heritage Foundation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;S. 1619 - Livable Communities Act&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;introduced by lame duck, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Chris Dodd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This bill will usurp power from local and state governments by impose new federal zoning regulations to measure to implementing the United Nations Agenda 21 "Sustainable Development" policy domestically within the United States.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities will be charged with administering two new grant programs.  One program will pay for multi-regional comprehensive planning; the other will pay for the projects called for in the multi-regional plans.  Nearly $4 billion is authorized to be appropriated.  A new Interagency Council on Sustainable Communities will see that "Sustainable Development" policies are implemented throughout the federal government. The Council will consist of cabinet secretaries or their designees. The Council will be authorized to hire a staff to “ensure interagency coordination of federal policy on sustainable development.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.timesexaminer.com/political/353-sustainable-development-livable-communities-act-s-1619"&gt;The Times Examiner&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land that is designated as “wilderness” occupies more than 107 million acres.  “Wilderness is land on which no human activity – other than walking  carefully – is allowed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dodd’s bill, like all sustainable development propaganda, paints a  warm and fuzzy picture of what ‘livable’ or ‘sustainable communities’  should be,” said Lamb. “The propaganda fails to point out that in order  to achieve this Marxist utopia, government has to enforce the vision.  This means that people must live where government says they must live;  in homes that meet the government’s design criteria; and travel to work  in vehicles approved by government. &lt;p&gt;The end result of the comprehensive land use plan is to draw lines  on a map, which deprives individuals of private property rights whose  land is outside the urban boundary zones – commonly called ‘Smart  Growth.’ The value of the land inside urban boundary zones skyrockets,  as does the cost of living for all who reside there.&lt;/p&gt; [Henry] Lamb [of Sovereignty International] concludes that: “Dodd’s bill goes a long way to transforming  America into what looks a lot like regional soviets where unelected  agency appointees draft a plan by which all must live, and then enforce  the plan with the power of law. Such a place cannot be described as ‘the land of the free.’ Nor can it be called ‘the home of the brave’ if voters allow this transformation to continue."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the non-profit American Policy Center the bill:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul type="disc"&gt;&lt;li&gt;Is a blueprint for the transformation of our society into total Federal  control.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Will enforce Federal Sustainable Development zoning and control of local  communities.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Will create a massive new “development” bureaucracy.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Will drive up the cost of energy to heat and cool your home.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Will drive up the cost of gasoline as a way to get you out of your car.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Will force you to spend thousands of dollars on your home in order to  comply.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/liberty/social-engineering-bill-in-senate-will-force-you-into-city/?eiid&amp;amp;rmid=2010_09_10_PLA&amp;amp;rrid=307016956"&gt;Personal Liberty Digest&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"A carrot and stick policy will be used to get your local government to sign  on. The carrot is billions of dollars in grants available if your local  government agrees to amend zoning laws that restrict housing in outlying areas,  forcing people to give up their homes and land and move into the city  center. &lt;p&gt;"The stick will be denial of the funds and bad publicity generated by “Green”  organizations criticizing government officials for turning down free money.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The rub is the grants will come with strings attached that force local  governments to bend to the will of the Feds.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The idea of these social engineering initiatives is to force people to live  in a congested area in high rise buildings with housing on the upper floors and  stores on the bottom. The whole area will be linked by mass transit creating the  “utopian” communities loved by socialists.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The result will be higher costs for housing (because overcrowding will make  housing space a premium) and goods and services (because of less choice and  competition) and less freedom to move about (because cars won’t be necessary and  parking space will be prohibitively expensive)."&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Yet Another Obamacare Surprise - 3.8% Home Sales Tax&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As  of January 1, 2013 a new 3.8% home sales tax will be slapped on home  sales for anyone who is considered rich ($250,000+/$200,000+ annual  gross income, married/single) for capital gains that exceed  $250,000/$500,000 for those who are single/married.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bear in mind  these are nominal dollar amounts.  Given the rate at which the Federal  Reserve is debasing the dollar it is easily possible to see a 10%  compounded inflation by 2013, and for inflation to thereafter continue  along its parabolic long-trending upward curve.  Eventually this added  progressive taxation will hit more and more of the middle class.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.R. 1064 - Youth Promise Act, aka "Cash for Crips"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The official full name of this bill is actually the "Prevention Resources for Eliminating Criminal Activity Using Tailored Interventions in Our Neighborhoods Act of 2009".  The bill has 235 House cosponsors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This bill seeks to spend $1.6 billion in taxpayer money toward rehabilitation centers for urban gang members.  Among the services covered by bill are the removal of gang tatoos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to Judicial Watch, “The infusion is necessary because budget cuts have forced groups like Homeboy Industries to stop paying gang members to attend work training sessions and carry out maintenance work at centers that offer them a variety of free perks. Some do administrative jobs to help out, but they still get regular checks.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Virginia Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.B. 1397 - Nullification of "Cap and Trade" Building Regulations&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delegate Bob Marshall has introduced H.B 1397 for the 2011 Virginia Legislative session to nullify federal building regulations that would be imposed under the impending federal "Cap and Trade" bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is the bill &lt;a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+sum+HB1397"&gt;summary&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Residential energy efficiency standards.&lt;/b&gt; Exempts any residential building or manufactured home in Virginia from being subject to federal "cap and trade" legislation if such buildings comply with the Statewide Uniform Building Code. The owner of such building or home cannot be required by the federal government to (i) have an energy efficiency analysis conducted on his residence, (ii) have his residence meet federal energy efficiency standards, (iii) participate in a building performance labeling program, (iv) make modifications to the residence in accordance with federal legislation, and (v) post a label showing the energy efficiency of his home prior to its sale. The bill also prohibits a state agency from assisting any federal agency in the implementation of global warming or climate change legislation.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-8123835766840757130?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/8123835766840757130/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/09/legislative-update-for-september-14.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/8123835766840757130'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/8123835766840757130'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/09/legislative-update-for-september-14.html' title='Legislative Update for September 14, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-3635427830036648819</id><published>2010-08-10T11:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-08-10T14:49:27.149-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for August 10, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 5741 - Mandatory National Service, introduced on July 15, 2010 by Charles Rangel&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;"To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and  42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed  services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense  and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the  uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of  the uniformed services, and for other purposes."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Note that this bill would be more comprehensive than the last national military draft.  The bill enslaves both men and women, and at much broader age group.  Some would say that since Barack Obama has committed the U.S. to war if Israel goes to war, passage of this bill will essentially put the freedom of U.S. citizens in the hands of the Israeli policy makers.  However, many forget that we are already at war in the Middle East, and we have had many wars since the last time the U.S. headed the Constitution to wage war in WWII with a declaration of war.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 1586 - Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;H.R. 1586 was originally the FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act, but the House-passed text of the FAA authorization was replaced in the Senate with an amendment sponsored by Sens. Reid (D-NV) and Murray (D-WA) to become a bailout.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The Senate passed the altered bill on August 5, 2010.  Nancy Pelosi has called a special session of Congress to address this bill.  The special session will cancel meetings that represenatives would have had with their constituents.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Facts about the bill:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;It contains a total of $26.1 billion in temporary state bailouts.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The bill provides $10 billion that states are REQUIRED to use to pay teacher salaries.  States who receive this money must agree to not reduce their budgets below 2009 levels.  This all but guarantees that further taxpayer funded bailouts will be required, because even if states wanted to take responsible action to reduce their spending, they are prohibited from doing so.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;This bill sets the stage for a nationalized education system by expanding federal government control over education and diminishing the role of parents, teachers and local communities.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Democrats claim this money is necessary spending on children’s education.  In reality, this is a blatant payoff for teachers unions, a significant Democrat base, which keeps demanding more money from taxpayers without producing better results for children.  The Wall Street Journal made this point in a July 14th editorial, “School districts have been adding to their payrolls for decades without regard to student enrollment and much to show in academic improvement.  Total education spending grew by 32% between 1999 and 2009, while K-12 enrollment has grown by less than 1% each year over the same time period.  The reality is that districts could economize and trim the bureaucracy without having to lay off as many teachers as they claim.”  But, this legislation would prohibit such economizing!&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The bill also increases Medicaid spending by $16.1 billion by extending the federal Medicaid matching rate of 6.2% to all states through December 2010, then phasing the matching rate increase down to 3.2% for the first three months of 2011, then to 1.2% for April through June 2011.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The legislation includes $9.7 billion in permanent tax increases on multinational companies.  This will absolutely kill jobs and further diminish the United States’ ability to compete with foreign corporations.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that this bill will increase the deficit by $12.6 billion.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;According to washingtonwatch.com, the bill will cost the average American &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_HR_1586.html"&gt;$126 a year&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 3534 - Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources (CLEAR) Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;This bill would the control of U.S. lakes and coastal waters in the in the hands of the National Ocean Council, which Barack Obama established through fiat by executive order.  This would be done by the creation of yet another new council would would be overseen by Obama's National Ocean Council.  The ultimate plan is to usurp the state and national sovereignty of these waters to place them in the control of unelected officials who agree with the tenants of the U.N.-sponsored Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).   LOST is part of Agenda 21, a fraudulent agenda to build up more top-down global control over formerly sovereign nations, under the guise of improving ecological sustainability.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;More info at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://bit.ly/cGNiXG"&gt;http://bit.ly/cGNiXG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; .&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R 5175 / S. 3628 Disclose Act - Failed Senate Cloture Vote&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The Disclose act failed a Senate cloture vote, 57-for to 41-against, on July 27.  60 votes are require for a cloture vote to pass.  This is a temporary victory against this terrible bill (which was discussed in the previous legislative report).  Since Harry Reid reversed his yay vote to nay at the last minute, after he saw that the cloture would fail, Senate rules allow him to move for reconsideration of the bill for another cloture vote at a time of his choosing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Obamacare surprise #1 - new Form 1099 IRS filing requirement on transactions &gt;= $600&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Starting Jan. 1, 2012, IRS Form 1099s must be filed for purchases of all goods and services by small businesses and self-employed people that exceed $600 during a calendar year.  This means that government would have the means to track significant purchases of precious metals.  It should be remembered that in 1933 President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 6102 and confiscated privately owned gold which was subsquently shipped overseas.  The previous owners of the confiscated gold were compensated by only a fraction of the gold's value.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Obamacare surprise #2 - Taxable income may be raised by employer cost of insurance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Starting in 2011, next year-the W-2 tax form will include the the cost of whatever health insurance you are provided.  There is some &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/08/healthcare-insurance-reporting-on-w2.html"&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; over whether this reported insurance cose will be included as part of gross income.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;If the insurance cost does get counted as gross income, this will effectively increase income taxes, and, for some who get bumped into a higher tax bracket, it would increase their tax rate.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;SEC Now Officially a Rouge Agency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;The recently-passed Financial "Reform" Bill gives SEC exemption to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  This basically means that the public will have little of any recourse to any economic interference by the SEC, and that that public also will not have adequate information to discern whether the SEC is properly performing its intended regulatory function.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R 5970 - SEC Transparency Act of 2010, introduced July 20, 2010 by Ron Paul&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;"To repeal the amendments made by section 929I of the Dodd-Frank Wall  Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to the  confidentiality of materials submitted to the Securities and Exchange  Commission."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-3635427830036648819?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/3635427830036648819/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/08/legislative-update-for-august-10-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/3635427830036648819'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/3635427830036648819'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/08/legislative-update-for-august-10-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for August 10, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-1035344045327666879</id><published>2010-07-13T11:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-13T14:27:51.841-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for July 13, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 5175 - Disclose Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;[passed June 24 House vote, 219-206 (Boucher - Nay, Goodlatte - Nay, Periello - Aye, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll391.xml"&gt;others&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;)]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;This bill has been called the Establishment Protection Act.  The bill amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require disclosure of all members and donors of all third polical groups that recieve donations.  It also require individuals or political groups that make "independent expendators" exceeding $10,000, or $1,000 within 20 days before an election, must file electronically a report within 24 hours of the transaction.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Without a special deal that the NRA made with the Democrat leadership to be exempt from the the bill's restrictions, the bill would not have passed.  Also exempted were labor unions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"&gt;S. 3480 - &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010 (PCNAA)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"&gt;sponsored by Joe Lieberman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Would grant the President far-reaching emergency powers to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;seize control of, or even shut down&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;, portions of the internet.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The legislation says that companies such as broadband providers, search engines or software firms that the US Government selects "shall immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed" by the Department of Homeland Security. Anyone failing to comply would be fined.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/internet-kill-switch-proposed-for-us-339303838.htm"&gt;ZDNET&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: left; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;To sweeten the deal for industry groups, Lieberman has included a tantalising  offer absent from earlier drafts: immunity from civil lawsuits. If a software  company's programming error costs customers billions, or a broadband provider  intentionally cuts off its customers in response to a federal command, neither  would be liable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If there's an "incident related to a cyber vulnerability" after the President  has declared an emergency and the affected company has followed federal  standards, plaintiffs' lawyers cannot collect damages for economic harm. And if  the harm is caused by an emergency order from the Feds, not only does the  possibility of damages virtually disappear, but the US Treasury will even pick  up the private company's tab.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;See also:  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/06/18/senate-bill-would-give-obama-power-to-shut-down-internet/"&gt;Senate Bill Would Give Obama Internet ‘Kill Switch’&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Financial "Reform" - H.R. 4173 and S. 3217&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The House rejected a motion to reinsert Ron Paul's H.R. 1207 Audit the Fed bill into the Financial "Reform" bill by a vote of 229-198.  This vote is particularly despicable because H.R. 1207 had 319 (of 434) cosponsors.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The majority of those who voted against the insertion were &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;cosponsors&lt;/span&gt; of H.R. 1207!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;There is one &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;silver lining&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; to the way things worked in for the bill -- the provision to expand the Federal Trade Commission’s powers—and with it, the likely restricted access to nutritional supplements—did not make it into the final Wall Street “Reform” bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Congressman Henry Waxman (D–CA), with the support of powerful Congressman Barney Frank (D–MA), made a strong last-ditch effort to save the provision we’ve fought so hard against. The conference committee deliberations went on until early Friday morning, but in the end, the provision was not accepted and will therefore not be in the reconciled bill that will be submitted for final House and Senate passage and presidential signature.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-1035344045327666879?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/1035344045327666879/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/07/legislative-update-for-july-13-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/1035344045327666879'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/1035344045327666879'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/07/legislative-update-for-july-13-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for July 13, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-658740313621499650</id><published>2010-06-08T12:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-06-08T14:20:00.191-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for June 8, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Financial "Reform"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;House and Senate Bills, H.R. 4173 and S. 3217, have each been passed and the two Congressional bodies are preparing for a conference committee to reconcile the differences in the two bills.  The Senate conferees are, Sens. Dodd (D-Conn.), Chambliss (R- Ga.),  Corker (R-Tenn.) Crapo (R-Idaho), Gregg (R-N.H.), Harkin (D-Iowa),  Johnson (D-S.D.), Leahy (D-Vt.), Lincoln (D-Ark.), Reed (D-Nev.), Shelby  (R-Ala.), and Schumer (D-N.Y.). The House is expected to announce their  conferees this week and it is still undetermined if this will be an  open or closed session.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) identified 12 major &lt;a href="http://atr.org/financial-reform-over-conferees-major-differences-a5039#ixzz0qIMU7dK7"&gt;differences&lt;/a&gt; between the two  bills that conferees must deliberate over.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H.R. 5444 - Private Option Health Care Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Introduced May 27, 2010.  This bill would which would completely repeal ObamaCare and replace it with free market solutions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In sharp contrast to mandates and force, H.R. 5444 would:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Provide all Americans with a tax credit for 100% of health care  expenses. The tax credit is fully refundable against both income and  payroll taxes;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Allow individuals to roll over unused amounts in cafeteria plans and  Flexible Savings Accounts (FSA);&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Provide a tax credit for premiums for high-deductible insurance policies  connected with Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and allow seniors to use  funds in HSAs to pay for medigap policies;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Repeal the 7.5% threshold for the deduction of medical expenses, thus  making all medical expenses tax deductible;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Guarantee individuals can purchase health insurance across state lines;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Permit a tax credit for negative outcomes insurance purchased before  medical treatment reducing expensive malpractice suits;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reduce barriers to importing FDA-approved prescription drugs.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;As of June 8, this bill &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;still&lt;/span&gt; has no cosponsors.  Again, as with the H.R. 4995 "End the Mandate Act",  where are all the House Republicans that protested ObamaCare?  (Since last month H.R. 4995 has gained only 3 cosponsors, for a total of 16.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contact your Congress critter and tell him that you want him to cosponsor &lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;both H.R. 5444 and H.R. 4995!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-658740313621499650?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/658740313621499650/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/06/legislative-update-for-june-8-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/658740313621499650'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/658740313621499650'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/06/legislative-update-for-june-8-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for June 8, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-5633344593253942388</id><published>2010-05-10T23:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-14T12:29:29.759-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Update for May 11, 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;style&gt;BODY {  MARGIN: 8px } .LW-yrriRe {  FONT: x-small arial } &lt;/style&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Companion Bills for more statist regulation and less freedom, under the guise  of "reform":&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R. 4173&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; - &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of  2009&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; (introduced by Barney Frank, Dec. 2, 1009)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;S. 3217&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; -  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Restoring American  Financial Stability Act of 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; (introduced by Chris Dodd, April 15,  2010)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"&gt;House version reverses decisions of previous Congresses, vastly  expanding the powers of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to act as a  legislature in its own right to govern an regulate industries which have nothing  to do with the current financial crisis.  Among the industries affected would be  the access and potency of health supplements and vitamins.  This form of control  is one of the agenda items of Codex Alimentarius, an eugenics agenda formed by  unelected globalists affiliated with the UN and WTO aimed at achieving top-down  global control of all food-related commerce.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"&gt;The only good part of H.R.  4173 is that it contains the language of Ron Paul's no-compromise Audit the Fed  Bill (H.R. 1207).  Unfortunately, Bernie Sanders did not introduce this language  into the Senate 3217 bill, which had as been in his S.604 companion bill to  Paul's H.R. 1207.  Instead, Sanders introduced a comparatively watered down  amendment, which, among many differences, would not allow any transactions  between the Fed and foreign central banks to be audited.  In addition, any audit  of the gold in Fort Knox (which is under the purview of the Fed) will also be off  the table.  Some say that it is not a coincidence that the Dow Jones momentarily  dropped nearly 1000 points at the same time that amendments to S. 3217 were  being discussed, and that the establishment's desire for Sanders' capitulation  could be a better explanation for the unprecedented market drop than the widely  posed notion of some "fat finger" order entry error on the part of some major market player.   Regardless of the explanation, the establishment got the result it wanted.   There is still some hope for a real Fed Audit.  Senator David Vitter has  committed to offering the H.R. 1207 / S. 604 audit language as an amendment to  the bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;H.R.4995&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; - &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;End the Mandate Act of 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; (Introduced by Ron  Paul, April 13, 2010)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"&gt;Repeals both the individual and employer mandates  enacted by Obamacare.  As of May 10, 2010 there are 13 cosponsors of the bill.   All House Republicans who opposed Obamacare should have cosponsored this bill by  now.  Where are they!?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;&lt;a name="may2010_s3194"&gt;S.3194&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; - &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Public Safety Employer-Employee  Cooperation Act of 2009&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; (introduced by Harry Reid on April 12, 2010)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"&gt;This  is a reintroduction of a previously unpassed bill.  Under the provisions of the  bill, regardless of state and local officials, every police officer and  firefighter will be handed over to union boss control. If municipalities refuse  to go along, the Federal Government will step in and turn over first responders  to Big Labor.  As with all labor negotiations, there is the possibility of a  break down and the resulting strike.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"&gt;Unions are effectively a control  structure of their participants.  The scope of union control would cross over jurisdictions, which would mean that local areas would effectively lose  sovereignty of their police and fire fighting squads because the loyalties of  those employed would compromised toward the interest of state and national unions.   This also means that grassroots efforts such as the Oathkeepers (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);" href="http://www.oathkeepers.org/" target="_blank"&gt;www.oathkeepers.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"&gt;), who  promote reaffirmed fealty to the U.S. Constitution among police and  firefighters (and military personnel), will also suffer as a result of this co-opted leadership by unions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-5633344593253942388?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/5633344593253942388/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/05/legislative-update-for-may-11-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5633344593253942388'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5633344593253942388'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/05/legislative-update-for-may-11-2010.html' title='Legislative Update for May 11, 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-4006166712303281810</id><published>2010-04-12T19:50:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-13T14:26:53.079-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Travesty of Obama Care</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Why ObamaCare (H.R. 3590) is Unconstitutional:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;The federal government has no authority under Article One, Section Eight the Constitution to force citizens to purchase insurance from for-profit corrupt corporations. The pretense by some elected officials that health care can be regulated uner the The Commerce Clause is also bogus.  The commerce cause is only relevant to commerce between states, and was intended to ensure regular commerce between the states of the union.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;Many elected officials are saying ObamaCare is Constitutional just  because there is not The federal government cannot artibrarily make up  its own powers just because the Constitution does not say the government  cannot regulate health care.  This turns the constitution on its head.  It is a ridiculous pretense that government is all powerful by default unless a power is explicitly denied.  The founders predicted efforts of this type to usurp power and they  gave us the Tenth Amendment, which declares that all powers not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved to the states and the people.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;The Constitution's Article I Section 7 states "All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."  ObamaCare increases taxes/revenues and as such MUST originate in the House according to the Constitution.  Contrary to this requirement this bill was passed into law without being first being properly considered in the House as a revenue-raising health care bill. [5]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;ObamaCare illegally commandeers state legislatures.  It undermines their state sovereign discretion and dictates to them how they must regulate or alter existing regulations for health care.  [Credit goes to Judge Andrew Napolitano for raising this point.]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;States are unequal under the law; benefits were granted to certain states or sections of states, that are not granted to all other states.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;The IRS will fine individuals who do not purchase health insurance.  This violates the 5th Amendment which prohibits the government from imposing fines without due process of law.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;li&gt;Not to mention that there are countless violations of personal privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment with the establishment of government tracking of medical records.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Health Care Rationing:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(commentary by Kathleen Gilbert and Peter  J. Smith [2])&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The National Right to Life Committee's (NLRC's) health care blog points out  that "Section 3209 of the health care bill ... effectively allows  federal bureaucrats at the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services  (CMS) of the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to  bar senior citizens from adding their own money, if they choose, to the  government contribution in order to get private-fee-for-service Medicare  Advantage (MA) plans less likely to ration life-saving treatment." &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;What  this amounts to, according to NRLC, is that "doctors, hospitals, and  other health care providers will be told by Washington just what  diagnostic tests and medical care is considered to meet 'quality' and  'efficiency' standards – not only for federally funded health care  programs like Medicare, but also for health care paid for by private  citizens and their nongovernmental health insurance.” &lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;“Treatment  that a doctor and patient in consultation deem needed or advisable to  save that patient's life or preserve or improve the patient's health but  which the government decides is too costly – even if the patient is  willing and able to pay for it – will run afoul of the imposed  standards. In effect, there will be one uniform national standard of  care, established by Washington bureaucrats and set with a view to  limiting what private citizens are allowed to spend on saving their own  lives." Read more from the NRLC on health care rationing in H.R. 3590 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);" href="http://www.nrlc.org/HealthCareRationing/SenateBill122309.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;: http://www.nrlc.org/HealthCareRationing/SenateBill122309.html.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Abortion Funding:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(commentary by Kathleen Gilbert and Peter J. Smith [2])&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Current restrictions in the health care bill say that federal funds  cannot be used directly to pay for abortions; however that does not  prevent federal dollars from propping up the bottom-line of insurance  companies that can re-allocate private dollars to pay for abortions. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Although  the Executive Order Obama signed following the bill's passage purports  to apply the Hyde amendment to the bill, the White House's Robert Gibbs  admitted that the president’s directive, revealingly titled &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-acts-consistency-with-longst"&gt;"Patient  Protection and Affordable Care Act's Consistency with Longstanding  Restrictions on the Use of Federal Funds for Abortion," &lt;/a&gt;merely &lt;a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/mar/10032506.html"&gt;"reiterates"  &lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;what is already in the bill, and does not address its inherent  flaws. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;- &lt;u&gt;Direct funding of abortion through the Community  Health Centers program:&lt;/u&gt; The new law directly appropriates $7 billion  for Community Health Centers (CHCs) into a separate fund. Since the  funding does not fall under annual Health and Human Services (HHS) appropriations, it is therefore  unconnected to any restriction on the use of these funds for abortion. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Some backers of H.R. 3590 have asserted that none of the 1,250  federally funded CHCs provide abortions; yet, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reproductiveaccess.org/getting_started/faq.htm"&gt;the  website &lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;of the Reproductive Health Access Project strongly assures  CHC operators that offering abortions is not only possible, but  "important for the health of your patient."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The President himself  defended “reproductive care” – a term typically used to imply abortion  services – as “essential care.” Without a legislative statute to the  contrary, it is possible that a court challenge launched by pro-abortion  groups could open up CHCs to provide abortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;- &lt;u&gt;Other direct  appropriations not covered by abortion restrictions:&lt;/u&gt; The Senate bill  contains additional pools of directly appropriated funds that are not  covered by any limitations regarding abortion, including $5 billion for a  temporary high-risk health insurance pool program (Sec. 1101 on pages  45-52) and $6 billion in grants and loans for health co-ops (Sec. 1322,  pp. 169-180). Only bill-wide, permanent language, such as the  Stupak-Pitts Amendment, could have ensured that none of these funds are  tapped by pro-abortion political appointees and bureaucrats to pay for  abortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;- &lt;u&gt;Federally administered abortion plans:&lt;/u&gt; The bill  would create a new program under which the federal Office of Personnel  Management (OPM) would administer two or more national (“multi-state”)  insurance plans. (See Section 1334.) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The bill provides that “at  least one” such plan would be subject to limitations on abortion  coverage. This implies that other federally administered plans could  cover elective abortions, or perhaps even be required to do so by the  federal administrator. This is a sharp break from longstanding federal  policy, adopted by Congress, under which plans that participate in the  OPM-administered Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program are  prohibited from covering elective abortions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Also, even the  purported requirement (pages 2087-2088) that the OPM program offer one  pro-life plan is rigged to expire each year; this requirement will  remain in force only if pro-life forces prevail annually in preserving  pro-life language on an unrelated annual appropriations bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;- &lt;u&gt;The  "abortion surcharge":&lt;/u&gt; Section 1303, page 2069 of the bill contains  the objectionable “Nelson-Boxer language,” under which private plans  that cover elective abortion would qualify for the federal subsidy.  However each enrollee in those plans that include abortion coverage  would have to pay an "abortion surcharge" of at least one dollar per  month. These funds would be used to pay for abortions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;This  requirement applies to anyone who enrolls – or may have to enroll – in a  subsidized plan that covers elective abortions. This will certainly  include many people who would learn of the abortion surcharge only after  enrolling, but who would also have no choice other than to pay the  abortion surcharge, or see their entire health coverage lapse. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;- &lt;u&gt;Authorities  for pro-abortion mandates:&lt;/u&gt; The new law contains a bewildering array  of provisions that grant authority to the Secretary of Health and Human  Services and other federal entities to issue binding regulations on  various matters. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Some of these provisions could be employed in  the future as carte blanche for the HHS to issue pro-abortion mandates,  requiring health plans to cover abortion and/or provide expanded access  to abortion, unless there is clear language to prevent it. For example,  under the Mikulski Amendment (Section 1001, pp. 20-21), the HHS could  force every private health plan to cover elective abortions merely by  placing abortion on a list of “preventive” services. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;While the  Senate bill does contain some anti-mandate provisions, NRLC's analysis  finds that these clauses are worded in such a way that they control only  specific provisions of the bill (e.g., the reference to “essential  health benefits” on page 2070), or are ambiguous in their scope.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;-  &lt;u&gt;Open door to future abortion funding in Indian health programs:&lt;/u&gt;  The Senate-passed health bill revamps and reauthorizes all Indian health  programs. In the House bill, these programs were permanently barred  from providing elective abortions by the Stupak-Pitts Amendment. But in  the Senate bill, no such prohibition exists, other than a mere  policy-neutral clause (Section 10221, pp. 2175-2176) that “punts” the  abortion policy, requiring that it be set annually on an appropriations  bill. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The Senate omitted the necessary pro-life language even  though a permanent Hyde Amendment had won approval by the Senate the  last time that the Indian health reauthorization (S. 1200) was on the  Senate floor in amendable form. (The House never acted on S. 1200.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;-  &lt;u&gt;Missing abortion conscience language: &lt;/u&gt;The House-passed bill  contained a codification of the “Hyde-Weldon” language (H.R. 3962,  Section 259), which would prevent government actors from penalizing  health care providers who refuse to participate in providing abortions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;However  pro-abortion senators blocked its inclusion in the Senate bill. The  so-called conscience protections in H.R. 3590 (e.g., on page 123) are  exceedingly narrow.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:180%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Obama's Own Private Army&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;[3]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt; Commentary by By Henry Lamb, World Net Daily, April 10, 2010:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Who knew that Obamacare  provides for a "Regular Corps," and a "Ready-&lt;br /&gt;Reserve Corps," of  officers and individuals who are appointed by the&lt;br /&gt;President?   Commissioned officers are subject to active duty at the&lt;br /&gt;call of  the Surgeon General.  The new law provides $17.5 million in&lt;br /&gt;each of  the first four years to recruit and train these reserves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;During  his campaign, Obama said, "We cannot continue to rely only&lt;br /&gt;on  our military . . . we've got to have a civilian security force&lt;br /&gt;just  as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.  We cannot&lt;br /&gt;continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the&lt;br /&gt;national security objectives we've set."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Beginning of  Obama's civilian security force&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Section 5210 of the  Patient's Protection and Affordable Care Act&lt;br /&gt;(a.k.a. Obamacare) may  be the beginning of Obama's civilian security&lt;br /&gt;force.  This section  amends Section 203 of the U.S. Public Health&lt;br /&gt;Service Act.  Why it  was included in the massive health care bill is&lt;br /&gt;a question in  search of meaningful answers.  Judge Andrew Napolitano&lt;br /&gt;from FOX  News [2] has a few questions of his own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The new law says  "The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to&lt;br /&gt;fulfill the need to  have additional Commissioned Corps personnel&lt;br /&gt;available on short  notice (similar to the uniformed service's reserve&lt;br /&gt;program) to  assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both&lt;br /&gt;routine  public health and emergency response missions."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;The law  requires the Ready Reserve to participate in "routine&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;training" to  meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Corps.  The  Ready Reserve "shall" be ready for involuntary calls to&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;active  duty.  The Ready Reserve must be prepared to respond to orders&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;from  the President to go anywhere in the country, or anywhere outside&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;the country.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;From HR 3590:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;SEC. 430. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Section 20 3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 20 4) is  amended to read as follows:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;SEC. 20 3. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular  Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national  emergency.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;PS- I spent 2 days on and off researching this to verify.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the  United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service  laws and compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923,  as amended.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps  shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the  Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and  consent of the Senate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps  shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon  General, including active duty for the purpose of training.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may be appointed to the  Service for the purpose of providing support to the health and delivery  systems maintained by the Service and any warrant officer appointed to  the Service shall be considered for purposes of this Act and title 37,  United States Code, to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned  Corps of the Service.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULAR  CORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Affordable Health  Choices Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps  under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date  of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to  be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESERVE.—&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the  need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short  notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve program) to assist  regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health  and emergency response missions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific  needs of the Commissioned Corps;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty  during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the  uniformed service reserve personnel;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant  during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as  for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and  domestic; and&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and  medically underserved communities (as defined in section 399SS) to  improve access to health services.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties and  responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are  authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to the  Office of the Surgeon General for each of fiscal years 20 10 through 20  14. Funds appropriated under this subsection shall be used for  recruitment and training of Commissioned Corps Officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;New Taxes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;(commentary by Steve Watson and Paul Watson [4])&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;As reported by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=ake7tOWwUT6E" target="_blank"&gt;Bloomberg News &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;today, analysis by the  nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation reveals that the  bill will generate $409.2 billion in additional taxes by 2019.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;In addition, the Congressional Budget Office states that the bill  also levies almost $69 billion more in penalties for those who fail to  meet mandates to buy insurance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Web/20102724.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Journal of Accountancy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; boils down some of  the tax hikes and penalty fees in H.R. 3590 and the Reconciliation Act –  the highlights include:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Excise Tax on Uninsured Individuals&lt;/strong&gt; –  Individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential coverage will be  subject to a penalty equal to $750. The fee for an uninsured individual  under age 18 is one-half of the adult fee.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Excise Tax on High-Cost Employer Plans&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; – The federal  government would impose a 40% tax on the value of employer-sponsored  health coverage exceeding certain thresholds. Those levels are projected  to be $8,500 for self only and $23,000 for any other level by the year  2013. This excise &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/health/policy/16health.html" target="_blank"&gt;was announced with fanfare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; by the White  House and labor unions in January and remains in the final bill.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Increase in additional tax on distributions from Health  Savings Accounts and Archer Medical Savings Accounts not used for  qualified medical expenses&lt;/strong&gt; – An increase from 10% to 20% on  taxes of money in a health savings account not used for qualified  medical expenses. For Archer medical savings accounts, an increase from  15% to 20%.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Additional Hospital Insurance Tax on High-Income Taxpayers&lt;/strong&gt;  – High income tax payers, making on a joint return over $250,000 and a  standard return over $200,000, are required to pay an additional 0.5% of  wages. This applies to both self-employed, and regularly employed  individuals.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fees on Health Plans&lt;/strong&gt; – A fee applied to all health  insurance providers based upon net premiums and any third party fees  associated with the administration of those programs. The fees will  total $6.7 billion annually. This figure begins at $8 billion in the  Reconciliation Act and rises to $14.3 billion by 2018.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tax on Indoor Tanning Services – &lt;/strong&gt;The act imposes a  10% tax on amounts paid for indoor tanning services. Like a sales tax,  the tax will be collected from the person tanning when payment for the  tanning services is made.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Business Insider boils down 15 more tax hikes &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/healthcare-bill-new-taxes-2010-3#" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; – highlights include:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tax on individuals without acceptable health care  coverage&lt;/strong&gt; – A 2.5% income tax on individuals who do not have  health care coverage, limited to a cost less than the average national  health care premium.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Excise tax on elective cosmetic medical procedures&lt;/strong&gt; –  A tax of 5% is levied upon the am mount paid for any cosmetic surgery.  This does not include the need for such surgeries created by trauma or a  disfiguring disease. If the tax is not collected by that professional  completing the procedure, their business is still liable for the  requirement.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Reconciliation Act also legislates for the following  surcharges&lt;/strong&gt;: 1% surcharge on individuals making more than  $350,000, 1.5% surcharge on individuals making more than $500,000, 5.4%  surcharge on individuals making more than $1 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Yet more tax provisions in the bill are highlighted by INvestors  Business Daily in their piece titled &lt;a href="http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/index.php/home/35-politicsinvesting/1563-20-ways-obamacare-will-take-away-our-freedoms" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our  Freedoms&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; – highlights include:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Taxes On Employers&lt;/strong&gt; – If you are a large  employer (defined as at least 101 employees) and you do not want to  provide health insurance to your employee, then you will pay a $750 fine  per employee (It could be $2,000 to $3,000 under the reconciliation  changes) (Section 1513).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Taxes on Pharmaceutical Companies – &lt;/strong&gt;The government  will extract a fee of $2.3 billion annually from the pharmaceutical  industry (Section 9008 (b)).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Taxes on medical device manufacturers&lt;/strong&gt; – The  government will extract a fee of $2 billion annually from medical device  makers (Section 1405).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Framework Established for Implanted RFID Microchipping:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span lang="FR-CA"&gt;Section 2521&lt;/span&gt; on page 1004 of the ObamaCare bill calls for the establishment of a &lt;span lang="FR-CA"&gt;'National Medical Device Registry"&lt;/span&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span lang="FR-CA"&gt;"The Secretary shall establish a national medical  device registry (in this subsection referred to as the registry, to  facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each  device that; (A) is or has been used in or on a patient; (B) is a class  III device; or a class II device that is implantable."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 17px;"&gt;What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? Approved  by the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 17px;"&gt;&lt;strong class="bbc"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf" class="bbc_url" title="External link" rel="nofollow external"&gt;FDA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 17px;"&gt; [6], a class II implantable device is an “implantable radio  frequency transponder system for patient identification and health  information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in  medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized  analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from  disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other  data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Page 1006 states that the National Medical Device Registry is "to be enacted within 36 months upon passage" of ObamaCare.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Today, hospitals throughout America &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/250658/rfid_chip_implants_planned_for_alzheimers.html?cat=5"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;have already recommending implanting of RFID  chips into patients for medical purposes, such as those who  suffer from Alzheimer's disease [5].  Soon it will become more common for RFID chips to be used in many more types of patients, which will be tracked by the national government database.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 17px;"&gt;Read more here:&lt;br /&gt;  http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/3193-national-healthcare-will-require-national-rfid-chips &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Other Details:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;16,500 new  combat-trained IRS agents armed with shotguns to enforce the mandatory  participation in health care insurance programs.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Student loans have been taken over by the federal government.  It  will  administer $1 trillion in student loans over the next decade [1].&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;u&gt;The marriage penalty:&lt;/u&gt; A Wall Street Journal &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126281943134818675.html"&gt;column&lt;/a&gt;   pointed out in January that both the House and Senate versions of the   health care reform legislation would force married couples to pay   "thousands of dollars more for the same health insurance coverage as   unmarried people living together." The penalty results from the fact   that guidelines for qualifying for health insurance subsidies rely on   federal poverty guidelines; therefore, married couples would be at a   disadvantage for receiving subsidies due to their combined income. [2]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Information Sources&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;[1] http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/03/26/dana-perino-student-loans-health-care-sen-kent-conrad-democrats-students/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;[2] excerpted from http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/apr/10040115.html)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;[3] http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=138629&lt;br /&gt;[4] http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamacare-taxing-the-american-people-into-oblivion.html&lt;br /&gt;[5] http://money.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978167682&lt;br /&gt;[6] http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf&lt;br /&gt;[7] http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/250658/rfid_chip_implants_planned_for_alzheimers.html?cat=5&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-4006166712303281810?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/4006166712303281810/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/04/travesty-of-obama-care.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/4006166712303281810'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/4006166712303281810'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/04/travesty-of-obama-care.html' title='The Travesty of Obama Care'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-7873673653998914740</id><published>2010-03-09T12:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-03-09T14:30:38.478-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislation Update for March 2010 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 180%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Virginia  Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Status of Bills is searchable online at&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);"&gt;http://leg1.state.va.us/lis.htm&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB10S1&lt;/span&gt; - House Bill 10, with Senate Substitution: &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Health Care Freedom Act&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[passed Senate vote, March 8; passed House vote, Feb. 11]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;§ 38.2-3430.1:1.&lt;/span&gt; No resident of this Commonwealth, regardless of whether he has or is eligible for health insurance coverage under any policy or program provided by or through his employer, or a plan sponsored by the Commonwealth or the federal government, shall be required to obtain or maintain a policy of individual insurance coverage. No provision of this title shall render a resident of this Commonwealth liable for any penalty, assessment, fee, or fine as a result of his failure to procure or obtain health insurance coverage. This section shall not apply to individuals voluntarily applying for coverage under a state-administered program pursuant to Title XIX or Title XXI of the Social Security Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;SB 417&lt;/span&gt; - Provides that a resident of the Commonwealth shall not be required to obtain or maintain a policy of individual insurance coverage.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed Feb. 12 House vote; Passed March 4 Senate vote; awaits Gov. McDonnell's signature.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 49&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; - &lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Repeals  one-handgun-a-month restriction.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed House voted on Feb. 16.  Currently in Senate Committee for Courts of Justice.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 15&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; - &lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Bars  the use of Virginia jails or prisons for federal terror prisoner  detention.&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed House voted on Feb. 12.  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Continued to 2011 session&lt;/span&gt; in Courts of Justice Committee.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"&gt;SB 280&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Removes the current cap of 4% for the  county meals tax and allows counties to impose an uncapped rate. The  bill would also allow counties to adopt or increase a meals tax by a  majority vote of the elected members of the governing body. &lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Jan 27 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Senate vote; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Successfully&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; killed&lt;/span&gt; (effectively by tabling) in the House Subcommittee by March 1 voice vote.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: georgia; font-size: 100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 570&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Changes the burden of proof from the  taxpayer to the assessor when a taxpayer appeals the assessment of real  property.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;[Passed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; Feb. 4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; House&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt; vote; Passed March 8 vote in  Senate Committee on Finance.]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;SB334&lt;/span&gt; - Allows Concealed Carry Permit holder to carry a handgun in restaurants and clubs, so long as he does not consume alcohol.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed Feb. 16 Senate vote; passed March 2 House vote.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 69&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Firearms Freedom Act&lt;/span&gt; - Declares that firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Virginia and retained within the borders of Virginia are not subject to federal law or regulation under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed Feb. 16 House vote; currently in Senate Committee for Courts of Justice where it is unlikely to pass.  Contact Delegate Morgan Griffith and urge him to &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;substitute HB 69 into SB 501&lt;/span&gt;; Griffith claimed the bills weren't germane, but they are -- they deal with the same section of law (18.2-308).  Morgan Griffith's email address: DelMGriffith@house.state.va.us]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 119&lt;/span&gt; - Eliminates Virginia's corporate income tax for taxable years beginning on and after January 1,  2013.  This bill improve employment opportunity in Virginia.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Bill in the House Committee on Appropriations; could be killed in committee]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 269 &amp;amp; HB 230&lt;/span&gt; - Gas tax increase – killed in committee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 652 - &lt;/span&gt;Provides that any restriction, change, or loss of access to or from  property taken under the power of eminent domain shall be subject to just compensation.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed Feb. 16 House vote; Passed March 1 vote in Senate Committee for Courts of Justice; passed March 3 vote in Senate Finance Committee; awaits Senate vote.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HB 30 - Budget Bill&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bob Marshall: &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"I was informed this weekend that the members of the Conference Committee working to reconcile the House and Senate versions of the budget have proposed adding what I believe to be an &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;unconstitutional &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;$76 million round of fee increases&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; to the House budget."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;HJ 124&lt;/span&gt; - Should be &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;opposed.  &lt;/span&gt;Will set the stage for easy passage of a naturopathic licensure bill that will put all traditional naturopaths and hundreds of natural health care practitioners in Virginia out of business.  Since only a small group of approximately 11 naturopaths are seeking licensure, passage of this resolution would severely restrict Virginia residents in their choice of health care providers. The house resolution gets their foot in the door for this destructive licensure bill to follow.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Passed Feb 8 House vote; to be continued in 2011 session in the Senate Committee on Rules.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 180%;"&gt;Federal Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S 3002&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"&gt;Bill to Amend the Federal Food, Drug,  and Cosmetic Act to impose new regulations on dietary supplements.  The bill reverses freedoms inherent in common law where prohibitions must be enumerated; instead, the the act would specify the only legal standards for supplements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;[Commentary from &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Alliance for Natural Health USA&lt;/span&gt;: "Hundreds of thousands of messages poured into the Senate opposing Senator McCain's bill, the bill that would have wiped out current legislative protections for dietary supplements. More and more messages were arriving by the day. The entire Congress began to take note. Senator McCain was embarrassed by our ad whose headline pointed out that he was misrepresenting and did not seem to understand his own bill.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Word is now racing around Capitol Hill that Senator McCain met with Senator Orin Hatch, a champion of natural medicine, and told him that he is withdrawing his support for the bill he authored, the so-called Dietary Supplement Safety Act (S 3002). &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;This means that the bill as written is now dead.&lt;/span&gt;"]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-7873673653998914740?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/7873673653998914740/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/03/legislation-update-for-march-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/7873673653998914740'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/7873673653998914740'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/03/legislation-update-for-march-2010.html' title='Legislation Update for March 2010 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-2420409236800762527</id><published>2010-02-08T21:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-16T08:39:23.338-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislation Update for  February '10 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:180%;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Virginia Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;Pro Gun Rights Bills&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 475&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Allows concealed carry permit owners to carry concealed in K-12 parking lots, and in schools when they are not in use for school activities.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 72&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Reduces the penalty from a felony to a Class 1 misdemeanor for someone carrying a firearm on K-12 school property with no criminal intent.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[The bill was tabled in committee on Feb. 8; unfortunately this will probably kill the bill.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 49&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Repeals one-handgun-a-month restriction.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:georgia;"&gt;Other Bills to Support:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0);font-family:georgia;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 570&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Changes the burden of proof from the taxpayer to the assessor when a taxpayer appeals the assessment of real property.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[Passed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; Feb. 4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; House&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; vote; referred to Senate.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 1319&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Exempts Virginia from enforcing the federal Clean Air Act and Copenhagen Accords.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[Voice vote continued bill into 2011 session.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 15&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Bars the use of Virginia jails or prisons for federal terror prisoner detention.&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[Passed Feb. 15 House vote&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;SB 417&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Declares that Virginia residents cannot be required to purchase or maintain health insurance. &lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[Passed Senate and House; awaits Gov. McDonnell's signature.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;Virginia Constitutional Amendments to Support&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 7&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Protects an individual's right to participate or decline to participate in a health care system or plan.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 26&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Limits the next year's spending to the previous year's total spending plus a factor for inflation and population increase.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HJ 115&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Enumerates previously vague powers of eminent domain; stipulates that eminent domain may not be used to increase the tax base, tax revenues, or employment. This amendment would effectively neuter the attrocious Supreme Court ruling on the Kelo case as applied in VA.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0);font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;OPPOSE:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;Ressurrection of the Death Tax!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 223&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;and&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 275&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;SUCCESS!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; HB 223 has been tabled, effectively killed; and HB 275 has been struck from the docket.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HB 230&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Gas tax increase.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;SB 280&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;Removes the current cap of 4% for the county meals tax and allows counties to impose an uncapped rate. The bill would also allow counties to adopt or increase a meals tax by a majority vote of the elected members of the governing body. &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt;[Passed Senate vote; oppose passage in the House of Delegates.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0);font-family:georgia;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;span style="font-size:12;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;Federal Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0);font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;Support Ron Paul's Bills:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HR 4248&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Free Competition in Currency Act&lt;/span&gt; - Lifts legal tender laws and allows for the free market competition of currencies in the U.S. Lifts sales and capital gains taxes on transactions in gold and silver, thereby legalizing monetary provisions in the Constitution, that have been suppress by unconstitutional laws. This bill would remove the Federal Reserve's currency monopoly and would result in repercussions for the Fed creating money out of thin air. Citizens would be empowered to maintain the value of their savings that would otherwise be lost to inflation. (See past blog post for further details.)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HR 3394&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Freedom of Health Speech Act&lt;/span&gt; - Provides that the FTC has the burden of proof if it alleges that a dietary supplement claim is false or misleading, and that it cannot prosecute a company without giving 30 days notice that such claim violates the law.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HR 3395&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Health Freedom Act&lt;/span&gt; - Provides that FDA has the burden of proof if it alleges that a claim is false or misleading, and says that FDA may not take action to prevent use of a truthful, non-misleading claim that any nutrient in a food or supplement can cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent any disease.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:georgia;"&gt;OPPOSE:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;HR 2159&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0)"&gt; - &lt;span style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009&lt;/span&gt; - Denies issuance and transfer of firearms to labeled domestic terrorists. Would allow Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, to "withhold" from court and from defendants any and all evidence in gun related criminal proceedings based upon the accusation of participation terrorism. Instead, the court must accept summaries of evidence provided by Holder. Essentially, the bill allows you to be disarmed and/or imprisoned without providing real evidence.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S 3002&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="color:#333333;"&gt;Bill to Amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to impose new regulations on dietary supplements. This bill will &lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;destroy the free market for dietary supplements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; of almost any type, including vitamins. This is part of the globalist agenda handed down from by the international Codex Alimentarius group to take away personal health freedom. There is a high likelihood that this bill could get attached to another statist bill, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;S 510&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, deceptively coined the "FDA Food Safety Modernization Act".&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:#333333;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;S 510&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - Gives futher advantages to mega corporate farmers and harms small farmers by giving a preferred voice to corporate farmers to be heard by the FDA. Harming small farms means that organic, non-GMO, chemical-free food will become more scarce.  The bill also usurps state soverignty and unconstitutionally asserts that the federal government can dictate food inspection practices which, again are likey to benefit the corporate farmers at the detriment of small farmers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-2420409236800762527?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/2420409236800762527/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/02/legislation-update-for-february-10.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/2420409236800762527'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/2420409236800762527'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/02/legislation-update-for-february-10.html' title='Legislation Update for  February &apos;10 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-7598969570044386624</id><published>2010-01-12T11:48:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T21:55:02.099-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Important Pending Virginia Legislation</title><content type='html'>&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;HB = House Bill ; SB = Senate Bill&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;Positive Virginia Legislation to Support&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HB 10 - Virginia Health Care Freedom Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by Bob Marshall&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;div class="post-body entry-content"&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Protects an individual's right and power to participate or to decline to participate in a health care system or plan. The bill prohibits any law that will infringe on an individual's right to pay for lawful medical services. The bill further prohibits the adoption of any law that imposes a penalty, tax, or fine upon an individual who declines to enter into a contract for health care coverage or to participate in a health care system or plan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; 60 - Amends Food Safety Preparation Law § 3.2-5130&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by David J. Toscano&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Exempts private homes from food safety inspections where the resident processes and prepares pickles, relishes, and salsas for sale to individuals at the home or at farmers markets and labeled "NOT FOR RESALE - PROCESSED AND PREPARED WITHOUT STATE INSPECTION." Private homes are already exempt from inspection where candies, jams, jellies, and baked goods are prepared and distributed accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; 69 - Firearms Freedom Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by Charles W. "Bill" Carrico&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Declares that firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Virginia and retained within the borders of Virginia are not subject to federal law or regulation under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; 106 - Concealed Carry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by Mark L. Cole&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Allows a person with a valid concealed handgun permit to carry a concealed handgun in a place of worship with permission of the leader of the religious meeting. The bill also eliminates the restriction against carrying a concealed handgun in a restaurant that serves alcohol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; 108 - Disposition of Firearms&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by Mark L. Cole&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Provides that no locality may participate in any program in which individuals are given a thing of value in exchange for surrendering a firearm to the locality unless the governing body of the locality has enacted an ordinance authorizing the participation of the locality. The ordinance shall require that such firearms shall be sold by public auction or sealed bids to a person licensed as a dealer or be disposed of in any other appropriate manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; 109 - Elimination of Firearms Licensing Fees and Records&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mark L. Cole&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Repeals local authority to impose a license tax of not more than $25 on persons engaged in the business of selling pistols and revolvers. Also, a recordkeeping requirement for such persons is deleted and the clerk of the circuit court shall destroy any such existing records.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;152 - &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Personal Protection for Private Security Employees&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by John M. O'Bannon, III&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Declares that firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Virginia and retained within the borders of Virginia are not subject to federal law or regulation under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;Virginia Legislation to Oppose, as explained by VCDL&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;SB 70 - Reinforces Federal Gun Ban for Domestic Violence Misdemeanor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by John M. O'Bannon, III&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;Allows a person convicted of certain criminal offenses to petition to have his conviction expunged after a five-year period has expired following the conviction, upon a showing that his opportunities for employment, education, or professional licensure are prejudiced by the existence of the criminal record. Expungement would not be available for someone convicted of a violent felony, a DUI-related offense, an offense for which registration on the sex offender registry is required, or domestic violence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;VCDL.org Comments&lt;/span&gt;: This bill disallows expungement for MISDEMEANOR domestic violence convictions if that conviction bans the possession of a firearm under federal law. Once convicted, you will be forever banned from possessing firearms as there will be no way to get that conviction expunged. The misdemeanor domestic violence gun ban is a travesty and we need to have a way for good people to get their gun rights back.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;HB 183&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; - Firearms Freedom Act&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;- &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sponsored by Joseph D. Morrissey&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Allows a person convicted of a criminal offense to have his conviction expunged after 10 years have passed following the conviction, upon a showing that his opportunities for employment, education, or professional licensure are prejudiced by the existence of the criminal record. Expungement would not be available for someone convicted of a violent felony, a DUI-related offense, an offense for which registration on the sex offender registry is required, or domestic violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"&gt;VCDL.org Comments&lt;/span&gt;: This bill is a matching bill to SB 70, which allows for expungement of certain convictions, but does not do so in a way that the federal government would likely accept because the expunged data is not really expunged, but is kept for possible reference in the future. Even if the expungements were valid, the bill does not allow the expungement of MISDEMEANOR domestic violence convictions if that conviction bans the possession of a firearm under federal law. Once convicted, you will be forever banned from possessing firearms as there will be no way to get that conviction expunged. The federal misdemeanor domestic violence gun ban is a travesty, is unconstitutional, and Virginia should not be supporting it in any way.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0pt"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-7598969570044386624?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/7598969570044386624/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/01/important-pending-virginia-legislation.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/7598969570044386624'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/7598969570044386624'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2010/01/important-pending-virginia-legislation.html' title='Important Pending Virginia Legislation'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-5889014910138386261</id><published>2009-12-16T20:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-16T20:18:48.517-08:00</updated><title type='text'>HR 4248: Free Competition in Currency Act</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Introduced 12/09/09&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;i&gt;Introduction combining Ron  Paul &amp;amp; “Fall of the Republic” economic data&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p&gt;      &lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;"  &gt;A  system of the reintroduction of  competing currencies needs to  be established now.  At this country’s emergence there was no  Federal government monopoly on coin and currency, no Federal Reserve   to print currency without regard to inflation.  In fact the Federal  government needs to have the ability to inflate the fiat Federal Reserve  Notes in order to carry on constant wars and at the same time provide  the people with their bread and circuses.  The current national  debt including toxic derivatives exceeds the GNP by 20 to 30 times.   Our economy is bankrupted.  The Wall Street bankers together with  their international partners are holding Congress hostage with the threat    of Marshall law unless more bailout currency is appropriated to them.   No amount of bailout is enough to stem the tide of the toxic derivatives  originally put in place by the Clinton administration.  Obama has  the same hencemen as Clinton.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;      &lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;"  &gt;To  take back control of our own currency, the following needs to be established:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol type="1"&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:130%;"  &gt;&lt;b&gt;Eliminate capital    gains and sales taxes on gold and silver coins.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:130%;"  &gt;&lt;b&gt;Reestablish private    mints.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:130%;"  &gt;&lt;b&gt;Eliminate legal    tender laws&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;"  &gt;     The Constitution, article I section 10 allows states to use only gold    and silver as legal tender in payment of debts.  The Constitution    says nothing about the Federal government declaring anything  a    legal tender.  The Federal government on its own declared the fiat    Federal Reserve Notes legal tender.  If people are free to reject    debased currency such as the Federal Reserve Notes, and instead demand    sound currency, than sound currency will return. A free market will    dictate this result.  Merchants and citizens would be free to reject    the Federal Reserve Notes and thus reject the yolk of the Federal Reserve!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-5889014910138386261?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/5889014910138386261/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/12/hr-4248-free-competition-in-currency.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5889014910138386261'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/5889014910138386261'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/12/hr-4248-free-competition-in-currency.html' title='HR 4248: Free Competition in Currency Act'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-4425446397896015928</id><published>2009-09-07T16:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-07T16:55:55.369-07:00</updated><title type='text'>H.J. Res. 5 - Repeal of 22nd Amendment</title><content type='html'>This joint resolution was introduced in the House by New York Representative José Serrano.  The resolution would repeal the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, removing the two-term presidential term restriction, enacted as a consequence of the four terms of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Given that we know our voting system has been &lt;strong&gt;compromised&lt;/strong&gt; by an expanding paperless system of &lt;a href="http://www.blackboxvoting.org/"&gt;black-box electronic voting&lt;/a&gt; (constructed thanks to the &lt;a href="http://www.fec.gov/hava/hava.htm"&gt;Help America Vote Act of 2002&lt;/a&gt;) passage of the resolution would mean that an unlimited dictatorial succession of presidential terms for Barack Obama or any other president would be possible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-4425446397896015928?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/4425446397896015928/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/09/hj-res-5-repeal-of-22nd-amendment.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/4425446397896015928'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/4425446397896015928'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/09/hj-res-5-repeal-of-22nd-amendment.html' title='H.J. Res. 5 - Repeal of 22nd Amendment'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-2085888078390083330</id><published>2009-09-07T15:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-07T16:01:52.020-07:00</updated><title type='text'>S. 773, Cybersecurity Act of 2009</title><content type='html'>The Cybersecurity Act of 2009, &lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s773/show"&gt;S. 773&lt;/a&gt;, was introduced by John Rockefeller of West Virginia under the guise of improving security of critical technical systems within government and private sectors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill usurps and centralizes more power to the Executive branch in the following ways:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;The bill empowers the President to declare a cyber security emergency and take control of any so-called "critical infrastructure" within the private sector.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;In such an "emergency" the President can also order companies to disclose private information, regardless of privacy laws like the Wiretap Act or the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;The bill creates a federal certification program for cybersecurity professionals. This certification would be mandatory for certain systems and networks within the private sector.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;em&gt;Status as of September 7, 2009&lt;/em&gt;: Three Cosponsors; in Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Related Links:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news162.htm"&gt;Obama's Latest Cyber Space Power Grab&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://bytestyle.tv/content/cybersecurity-act-2009-president-can-take-over-internet-access-private-data"&gt;Cybersecurity Act of 2009: What You Should Know&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-2085888078390083330?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/2085888078390083330/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/09/s-773-cybersecurity-act-of-2009.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/2085888078390083330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/2085888078390083330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/09/s-773-cybersecurity-act-of-2009.html' title='S. 773, Cybersecurity Act of 2009'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-189501172191717015</id><published>2009-08-28T15:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-28T15:45:04.398-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='HR 1495'/><title type='text'>HR 1495</title><content type='html'>Purpose:  To amend the IRS Code of 1986 to make health care coverage more accessible and affordable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Ron Paul introduced this bill which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Health Insurance costs: a. CRDEIT  1.  the amount paid by the taxpayer for insurance which constitutes medical care for the taxpayer and the taxpayer's spouse and dependents &lt;br /&gt;plus                               2.  the amount contributed to a health savings account of the individual&lt;br /&gt;                        b. LIMITATION  1.  the taxpayer's net income tax&lt;br /&gt;plus                                   2.  the taxpayer's social security taxes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Disposition of unused health benefits:  carried forward to the next year (no loss)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening Health Savings Accounts:  the amount allowable as a deduction to a taxpayer under subsection (a) for the taxable year shall not exceed $8000 or $16000 for a joint return&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;REPEAL OF 7.5% THRESHOLD ON DEDUCTION FOR MEDICAL EXPENSES!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;COMMENT:  Immediately, anyone who works benefits from the above proposed changes.  This is the 1st of a series of bills that Dr. Ron Paul will introduce to the House to take on the health care issue, bypassing Obama's proposal for health care. Write your congressman now to support this bill.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-189501172191717015?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/189501172191717015/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/08/hr-1495.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/189501172191717015'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/189501172191717015'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/08/hr-1495.html' title='HR 1495'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-2750778402393782942</id><published>2009-08-25T07:28:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-25T08:21:29.094-07:00</updated><title type='text'>HR 3200</title><content type='html'>The hot topic of debate these days are the health care reform bills. The front runner in the House of Representatives is HR 3200. What is so bad about health care reform anyway? First and foremost, it is unconstitutional. Article 1, section 1 says that&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States..". &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That is easy enough to understand, Congress is they only branch of the federal government that has been granted the power by the States to make laws. This does not mean that Congress can make just any law it feels like. Article 1, section 8 lays out the powers of Congress&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To establish Post Offices and post Roads;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To provide and maintain a Navy;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Herein we find the root problem with health care reform. The federal government has no authority under the Constitution of the United States to legislate health care. If that power has not been given to the federal government, then it belongs to the States respectively. That should be the end of the debate, but unfortunately, it is not. We know our Representatives only consider what we think when enough of us speak up. The rest of the time they hear from special interest groups and lobbyists. Why do we see the CEO of Carillion and pharmaceutical representatives trying to sell us this health care reform? It is suspicious at best. These corporations will be reaping the benefits from health care reform, they would lobby against it otherwise. So often the loudest voices heard have the most dollar signs attached. We must never forget the men and women in Washington are supposed to be working for us, and it is our duty to supervise their activities, just like any "boss" should. We can have the ultimate effect on our elected representatives pocketbook by not re-electing them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In regards to the actual bill, HR 3200, there is much to be desired. I will not break down every part, this has been done already by many different people. I will provide links and encourage you to read and share what you see. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://theobjectivestandard.com/blog/2009/08/health-care-bill-what-hr-3200-americas.asp"&gt;What does is say about major health care issues?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://shoutfirst.blogspot.com/2009/08/ongoing-review-of-hr-3200.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Page by page breakdown of HR 3200.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-2750778402393782942?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/2750778402393782942/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/08/hr-3200.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/2750778402393782942'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/2750778402393782942'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/08/hr-3200.html' title='HR 3200'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4985359101674941591.post-4770026865177102080</id><published>2009-07-26T00:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-26T02:39:47.984-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Legislative Alerts for July 14 Meeting</title><content type='html'>&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;     /* default css */  table {   font-size: 1em;   line-height: inherit;   border-collapse: collapse; }   tr {      text-align: left;    }   div, address, ol, ul, li, option, select {   margin-top: 0px;   margin-bottom: 0px; }  p {   margin: 0px; }   pre {   font-family: Courier New;   white-space: pre-wrap;   margin:0; }  body {   margin: 6px;   padding: 0px;   font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;   font-size: 10pt;   background-color: #ffffff; }   img {   -moz-force-broken-image-icon: 1; }  @media screen {   html.pageview {     background-color: #f3f3f3 !important;   }        body {     min-height: 1100px;          counter-reset: __goog_page__;   }   * html body {     height: 1100px;   }   .pageview body {     border-top: 1px solid #ccc;     border-left: 1px solid #ccc;     border-right: 2px solid #bbb;     border-bottom: 2px solid #bbb;     width: 648px !important;     margin: 15px auto 25px;     padding: 40px 50px;   }   /* IE6 */   * html {     overflow-y: scroll;   }   * html.pageview body {     overflow-x: auto;   }   /* Prevent repaint errors when scrolling in Safari. This "Star-7" css hack      targets Safari 3.1, but not WebKit nightlies and presumably Safari 4.      That's OK because this bug is fixed in WebKit nightlies/Safari 4 :-). */   html*#wys_frame::before {     content: '\A0';     position: fixed;     overflow: hidden;     width: 0;     height: 0;     top: 0;     left: 0;   }               .writely-callout-data {       display: none;       *display: inline-block;       *width: 0;       *height: 0;       *overflow: hidden;     }     .writely-footnote-marker {       background-image: url('images/footnote_doc_icon.gif');       background-color: transparent;       background-repeat: no-repeat;       width: 7px;       overflow: hidden;       height: 16px;       vertical-align: top;               -moz-user-select: none;     }     .editor .writely-footnote-marker {       cursor: move;     }     .writely-footnote-marker-highlight {       background-position: -15px 0;       -moz-user-select: text;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection ::-moz-selection, .writely-footnote-hide-selection::-moz-selection {       background: transparent;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection ::selection, .writely-footnote-hide-selection::selection {       background: transparent;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection {       cursor: move;     }           .editor .writely-comment-yellow {       background-color: #FF9;       background-position: -240px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-yellow-hover {       background-color: #FF0;       background-position: -224px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-blue {       background-color: #C0D3FF;       background-position: -16px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-blue-hover {       background-color: #6292FE;       background-position: 0 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-orange {       background-color: #FFDEAD;       background-position: -80px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-orange-hover {       background-color: #F90;       background-position: -64px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-green {       background-color: #99FBB3;       background-position: -48px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-green-hover {       background-color: #00F442;       background-position: -32px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-cyan {       background-color: #CFF;       background-position: -208px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-cyan-hover {       background-color: #0FF;       background-position: -192px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-purple {       background-color: #EBCCFF;       background-position: -144px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-purple-hover {       background-color: #90F;       background-position: -128px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-magenta {       background-color: #FCF;       background-position: -112px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-magenta-hover {       background-color: #F0F;       background-position: -96px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-red {       background-color: #FFCACA;       background-position: -176px 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-red-hover {       background-color: #FF7A7A;       background-position: -160px 0;     }      .editor .writely-comment-marker {       background-image: url('images/markericons_horiz.gif');       background-color: transparent;       padding-right: 11px;       background-repeat: no-repeat;       width: 16px;       height: 16px;       -moz-user-select: none;     }      .editor .writely-comment-hidden {       padding: 0;       background: none;     }     .editor .writely-comment-marker-hidden {       background: none;       padding: 0;       width: 0;     }     .editor .writely-comment-none {       opacity: .2;       filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(opacity=20);       -moz-opacity: .2;     }     .editor .writely-comment-none-hover {       opacity: .2;       filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(opacity=20);       -moz-opacity: .2;     }           .br_fix span+br:not(:-moz-last-node) {          position:relative;          left: -1ex        }       #cb-p-tgt {     font-size: 8pt;     padding: .4em;     font-style: oblique;     background-color: #FFF1A8;     border: 1px solid #000;   } }  h6 { font-size: 8pt } h5 { font-size: 8pt } h4 { font-size: 10pt } h3 { font-size: 12pt } h2 { font-size: 14pt } h1 { font-size: 18pt }  blockquote {padding: 10px; border: 1px #DDD dashed }  .webkit-indent-blockquote { border: none; }  a img {border: 0}  .pb {   border-width: 0;   page-break-after: always;   /* We don't want this to be resizeable, so enforce a width and height      using !important */   height: 1px !important;   width: 100% !important; }  .editor .pb {   border-top: 1px dashed #C0C0C0;   border-bottom: 1px dashed #C0C0C0; }  div.google_header, div.google_footer {   position: relative;   margin-top: 1em;   margin-bottom: 1em; }   /* Table of contents */ .editor div.writely-toc {   background-color: #f3f3f3;   border: 1px solid #ccc; } .writely-toc &gt; ol {   padding-left: 3em;   font-weight: bold; } ol.writely-toc-subheading {   padding-left: 1em;   font-weight: normal; } /* IE6 only */ * html writely-toc ol {   list-style-position: inside; } .writely-toc-none {   list-style-type: none; } .writely-toc-decimal {   list-style-type: decimal; } .writely-toc-upper-alpha {   list-style-type: upper-alpha; } .writely-toc-lower-alpha {   list-style-type: lower-alpha; } .writely-toc-upper-roman {   list-style-type: upper-roman; } .writely-toc-lower-roman {   list-style-type: lower-roman; } .writely-toc-disc {   list-style-type: disc; }  /* Ordered lists converted to numbered lists can preserve ordered types, and    vice versa. This is confusing, so disallow it */ ul[type="i"], ul[type="I"], ul[type="1"], ul[type="a"], ul[type="A"] {   list-style-type: disc; }  ol[type="disc"], ol[type="circle"], ol[type="square"] {   list-style-type: decimal; }  /* end default css */    /* custom css */   /* end custom css */  /* ui edited css */  body {   font-family: Tahoma;      font-size: 12.0pt;   line-height: normal;   background-color: #ffffff; } /* end ui edited css */   /* editor CSS */ .editor a:visited {color: #551A8B} .editor table.zeroBorder {border: 1px dotted gray} .editor table.zeroBorder td {border: 1px dotted gray} .editor table.zeroBorder th {border: 1px dotted gray}   .editor div.google_header, .editor div.google_footer {   border: 2px #DDDDDD dashed;   position: static;   width: 100%;   min-height: 2em; }  .editor .misspell {background-color: yellow}  .editor .writely-comment {   font-size: 9pt;   line-height: 1.4;   padding: 1px;   border: 1px dashed #C0C0C0 }   /* end editor CSS */  &lt;/style&gt;&lt;script&gt;     function DoPageLoad() {              window.TimeoutId = setTimeout('');       parent.TIME_doc_load_full = new Date().getTime();     }   &lt;/script&gt;&lt;style&gt;&lt;/style&gt;&lt;div style="font-family: Tahoma;" class="Section1"&gt; &lt;p style="text-align: center; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="text-align: center; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:180%;"&gt;Federal Legislative Alerts&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="text-align: center; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nefarious  Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;H.R. 2454 -  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cap and Trade&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;Passed the House  on June 26; &lt;b&gt;no Senate bill yet&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:'Arial';"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;   This bill was over 1400 pages long  and 256 pages were added the same day as the House vote.  The pretense of the  bill was to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:'Arial';"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;combat  climate change, give us clean air, build alternative energy.  However, many  measures of the bill are based on pseudoscience, such as the notion that carbon  dioxide is the primary culprit for global warming, and that the carbon tax the  bill institutes will solve this problem. Experts say H.R. 2454  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;would redistribute $2 trillion dollars from the productive economy  into the hands of powerful favored institutions via its complex regulatory  scheme.  The bill also mandates every home owner to submit to a home energy  audit, under potential threat of fines for refusal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;S. 909 and H.R.  1913 - Hate Crimes Bill (Pedophile Protection Act)&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committees: Senate Judiciary &amp;amp; House Judiciary&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;   Creates thought crimes out of  a new class of "perceived" hate crimes.  The bill violates the 14th Amendment's  equal protection under the law provision. Local and state prosecutors would  receive more federal assistance in pursuing a cases that are perceived to be  motivated by perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual  orientation, or disability of the victim .  Pedophiles would be included under  this special protection.  Justice for victims of otherwise ordinary crimes would  take a backseat to prosecuting hate crimes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;H.R. 675 -  A&lt;/span&gt;mendment to Title 10, United States Code&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;-  &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committees:  House Judiciary &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;  Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security; House Armed  Services&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;   Extends to civilian employees  of the Department of Defense the authority to execute warrants, make arrests,  and carry firearms. H.R. 675 sidesteps Posse Comitatus by defining "law  enforcement officer of the Department of Defense."  This bill is a step toward  formation of Obama's "civilian national security force," which some would liken  to Hitler's "brownshirts."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;S. 1261 - Pass ID  Act - &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committee: Senate Homeland Security and  Governmental Affairs&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;   Repackages the  Real ID to mandate state drivers licenses to conform to a global biometric  standard.  This bill is a key component of globalist plans for the establishment  of a real-time accessible "Big Brother" surveillance and control system. This  bill, like Real ID, is pushed by AAMVA and ICAO, two agencies of the United  Nations.  Visit &lt;/span&gt;www.stoprealidcoalition.com for more info.   &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;H.R. 759 -  &lt;/span&gt;Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act of 2009&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committee: House Energy and Commerce&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;   Would grant full authority to  the FDA to set minimum, "science-based" standards for what it deems the safe  production and harvesting of produce in the "global market."  Requires farms to  register with the FDA and pay annual registration fees for program compliance,  as well as other requirements including hazard evaluation, preventive hazard  control, and copious record-keeping stipulations, regardless of the farm's size,  organic certification, or already-existing safety guidelines.  The same  regulations placed on large agribusiness would be placed on farmers providing  fresh vegetables at the local farmers market.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 875 and S.  425 - Food Safety Modernization Act - &lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committees: House  Agriculture subcommittee on &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Livestock, Dairy,  and Poultry; House Energy and Commerce; Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and  Forestry&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;   Establishes NAIS (National  Animal Identification System) requirements the will be cost prohibitive to small  farmers to comply with.  Gives federal government authority to track all  livestock.  Gives competitive advantage large corporate farms.  Noncompliance  potentially results in hefty fines, asset seizure, and prison time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 2749  - Food  Safety Enhancement Act&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committee House Energy and Commerce  subcommittee for Health&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;   Allows the FDA to quarantine  any geographic area to prohibit or restrict the movement of food or the  transportation of. This bill also provides the authority to shut down local food  sources and would empower the FDA to regulate how crops are raised and  harvested.  This bill effectively allows for martial law to be enforced by the  FDA in a supposed 'food safety' act. Additionally, putting the FDA on the farm  will cost the small farmer and would once again favor corporate farming.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 645 -  National Emergency Center Establishment Act&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committees: House Armed Services subcommittee for Terrorism,  Unconventional Threats and Capabilities; House Transportation and Infrastructure  subcommittee for Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency  Management&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;   Directs the Secretary of  Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers otherwise known as  FEMA camp facilities on military installations.  Existing infrastructure is to  be used for the implementation of these facilities.  Essentially this bill  amounts to legalization of the FEMA camps that have already documented already  exist across the country.  Such camps are purported to exist under benevolent  auspices.  However, if this is so, one has to question why the camps have been  photographs with barbed wire at top of fences angled inward.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;H.R. 676 -  &lt;/span&gt;National Health Insurance Act&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committees: House  Energy and Commerce, House Ways and Means, House Natural  Resources&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;   Establishes a  single-payer, socialized health care system, financed at taxpayer  expense.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="text-align: center; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;Constructive Legislation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 1207 and S. 604 - Bills  to Audit the Federal Reserve&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Committees: House Financial  Services&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, Senate committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs - &lt;b&gt;#  of Cosponsors: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 1207 has 260; S. 604 has 8.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"&gt;   Call for transparency of the  Fed.  Requires the GAO to conduct a full audit of their  activities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="font-family: Tahoma;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 450 - Enumerated Powers Act&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Committees: House Judiciary subcommittee for Constitution, Civil Rights,  and Civil Liberties; House Rules&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would require Congress to specify  the source of authority under the United States Constitution for the enactment  of laws, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 3021 - Citizens Protection  Act&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Committee: House Judiciary&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Eliminates 1/2  mile wide gun-free zones established by the Gun-Free School Zones Act of  1990.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 3022 - Second Amendment Protection Act&lt;/b&gt; - Eliminates gun  purchase background checks, waiting periods, lock requirements, and sporting  distinctions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="font-family: Tahoma;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Read the Bills Act&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;written by  DownsizeDC.org; not yet introduced&lt;/i&gt; ; Would require each house of Congress,  in a quorum, to read any bill that is voted on. Bills must be reread in full, if  amended.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Useful www resources:  opencongress.org, govtrack.us, or Google search of bill  numbers.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4985359101674941591-4770026865177102080?l=legislativevigilance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/feeds/4770026865177102080/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/07/legislative-alerts-for-july-14-meeting.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/4770026865177102080'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4985359101674941591/posts/default/4770026865177102080'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legislativevigilance.blogspot.com/2009/07/legislative-alerts-for-july-14-meeting.html' title='Legislative Alerts for July 14 Meeting'/><author><name>2nd Tuesday Constitution Group</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01315038738647233601</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ktIiQiYbnFE/SmwR2PaQ7HI/AAAAAAAAAAM/TE9v1hyJ5-c/S220/250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
